PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 11142749

The interpretation of multifocal binary kernels.

E Sutter
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The interpretation of binary kernels derived by means of the mulifocal ERG has frequently been the source of confusion and controversy. The aim of this paper is to provide an intuitive understanding of the concept of kernels and to demonstrate with models and examples, the relationship between the kernels and individual responses. The sample data used to illustrate the various aspects of the technique were derived and analyzed by means of the multifocal VERIS instrument using bipolar Burian-Allen contact lens electrodes. From the kernel data, response waveforms are synthesized that can be readily compared with those obtained with conventional flash, double flash and multi-flash ERG techniques. From the kernels of a single multifocal record, waveforms are synthesized that describe responses at various times after a preceding focal flash. It is shown that the observed adaptive changes in the waveforms depend not only on the flash interval but also on retinal eccentricity. Features on the response waveform exhibit independent adaptive behavior suggesting that they originate from different retinal sources. On one hand, the examples presented here illustrate the rich information on retinal dynamics contained in the kernels. On the other hand, they demonstrate how the interpretation of multifocal data can be facilitated when the kernel series is transformed into representations with more direct physiological appeal.

Explore related subjects

Adaptation, OcularData Interpretation, StatisticalElectroretinographyHumansPhotic StimulationRetinaJournal ArticleResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tResearch Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

E Sutter. 2000. The interpretation of multifocal binary kernels.. https://doi.org/10.1023/a%3A1002702917233

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2002

A method for comparing psychophysical and multifocal electroretinographic increment thresholds.

The multifocal electroretinogram (mfERG) has been commonly used as a method for obtaining objective visual fields. Although qualitative comparisons have been good, quantitative comparisons between the results from mfERG and the results from Humphrey Visual Field Analyser (HVFA) have found variable degrees of agreement depending upon the mfERG response parameter examined and/or the disease studied. Lack of agreement may be due to differences in methodology, differences in the sites of response generation, and/or differences derived from comparing suprathreshold versus threshold responses. In addition, the two procedures are performed at different levels of adaptation. We developed an approach for matching stimulus parameters and compared mfERG and psychophysical thresholds to assess the effects of technique and level of adaptation on the two responses. Psychophysical and mfERG thresholds were obtained as a function of the adaptation level (1.5-4.0 log td) and retinal location. The derived increment threshold-versus-intensity functions for both measures were fitted using the equation logT=logT(0)+log((A+A(0))/A(0))(n). We found that the values of A(0) for the mfERG data were one log unit higher than those for the psychophysical data. In addition, the value of the slope (n) for the mfERG data was shallower (0.8) than that of the psychophysical data (1.0). Predictions were made about comparisons of HVFA threshold and mfERG amplitude data in patients with retinal disease based upon a two-site model of adaptation. The data for some groups of patients could be best-fitted with a model of a disease acting at a site distal to all gain changes, whereas data from other patients were best fitted with a model of a disease acting at a site proximal to all retinal gain. The relationship between the Humphrey visual field threshold losses and mfERG amplitude reductions depends upon the site and mechanism of a particular disease process and the model of retinal gain assumed. In no case is a one-to-one relationship between the losses in the two measures predicted.

Adaptation, Ocular↗
PubMed2002

Mechanisms isolated by frequency-doubling technology perimetry.

PURPOSE: The frequency-doubling (FD) phenomenon describes the increase in apparent spatial frequency occurring when low-spatial-frequency sine wave gratings undergo rapid counterphase flicker. It is unclear whether the visual mechanisms isolated when pattern appearance is used as a threshold criterion are the same as when a simple detection criterion (as in FD perimetry) is used. It is also unclear whether the FD stimulus isolates mechanisms that differ from those isolated by spatially uniform flicker. In the current study, adaptation and spatiotemporal tuning functions were determined, using the FD stimulus, uniform flicker, and static (nonflickering) grating targets, to establish whether distinct mechanisms are isolated by the FD stimulus. METHODS: Spatiotemporal tuning functions were determined in six observers, using an FD stimulus under conditions of detection and resolution and using spatially uniform flickering stimuli and static grating stimuli. The effect of light adaptation on these stimulus classes was also assessed. All stimuli were 10 degrees-wide squares. RESULTS: Spatiotemporal tuning functions and adaptation characteristics were identical for both the FD detection and resolution paradigms. Spatially uniform flicker gave indistinguishable tuning functions and adaptation characteristics to the FD stimulus at 25 Hz and higher, but differed below this frequency. Static grating stimuli differed from FD stimuli in both tuning functions and adaptation characteristics. CONCLUSIONS: Absolute detection of the FD stimulus involves mechanisms that are indistinguishable from those involved when a criterion based on spatial form (i.e., resolution of a pattern) is used, indicating that a simple detection criterion can be used in FD perimetry. The FD stimulus isolates similar mechanisms to spatially uniform flickering stimuli at high temporal frequencies.

Adaptation, Ocular↗