PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 11148305

Thinking.

Abstract

Reasoning processes allow the human cognitive system to go beyond the information readily available in the environment. This review focuses on the processes of human thinking, including deductive reasoning, induction, mental simulation, and analogy. We survey recent trends across several areas, including categorization, mental models, cognitive development, and decision making. Our chief organizing principle is the contrast between traditional approaches that focus on abstract logical reasoning and a number of current approaches that posit domain-specific, knowledge-intensive cognition. We suggest that some instances of domain-specific cognition result from domain-general processes operating on domain-specific representations. Another theme is the link between reasoning and learning. We suggest that learning typically occurs as a byproduct of reasoning, rather than as an end in itself.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

A B Markman, D Gentner. 2001. Thinking.. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.223

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

The emergence of abstract ideas: evidence from networks and babies.

What is abstraction? In our view, abstraction is generalization. Specifically, we propose that abstract concepts emerge as the natural product of associative learning and generalization by similarity. We support this proposal by presenting evidence for two ideas: first, that children's knowledge about how categories are organized and how words refer to them can be explained as learned generalizations over specific experiences of words referring to categories; and second, that the path of concepts from concrete to more abstract can be observed throughout development and that even in their more abstract form, concepts retain some of their original sensory basis. We illustrate these two facts by examining, in two kinds of learners--networks and young children--the development of three abstract ideas: (i) the idea of word; (ii) the idea of object; and (iii) the idea of substance.

Cognition↗

Abstraction and context in concept representation.

This paper develops the notion of abstraction in the context of the psychology of concepts, and discusses its relation to context dependence in knowledge representation. Three general approaches to modelling conceptual knowledge from the domain of cognitive psychology are discussed, which serve to illustrate a theoretical dimension of increasing levels of abstraction.

Cognition↗

Workers' assessments of manual lifting tasks: cognitive strategies and validation with respect to objective indices and musculoskeletal symptoms.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the different cognitive strategies adopted by workers in assessing the effects of lifting-task parameters on effort, and to validate workers' assessments. METHODS: Questionnaires were administered to 217 male workers with varied levels of experience in manual handling. Workers were asked to assess the effects of lifting on perceived effort, using linguistic descriptors (e.g., light, heavy), and to determine the physical meaning of such descriptors. In addition, each worker assessed on-the-job effort, perceived risk of injury and work dissatisfaction, and musculoskeletal outcomes in a cross-sectional design. RESULTS: Perceived physical effort was significantly associated with lifting variables. Results indicated that the three-cluster strategy is the best performer. Weight of load emerged as the most influential factor that impacted on effort in the most dominant cluster (close to 50% of the observations). The second cluster (25% of the observations) demonstrated that weight, horizontal distance, and twisting angle, contributed equally to effort, and the third cluster had weight and vertical travel distance as the most important variables (with travel distance being more important). Perceived effort was significantly associated with objective indices (i.e., biomechanical lifting equivalent and NIOSH lifting index), and musculoskeletal symptoms in eight body parts. CONCLUSIONS: Cognitive reasoning of experienced workers may be used as an active device for the evaluation of strenuous physical activities such as lifting tasks. Lifting activities are significantly associated with musculoskeletal symptoms, not only in the lower-back region, but also in seven other body parts; and effort may integrate the effects of both physical (lifting tasks) and non-physical (i.e., work dissatisfaction) factors, as well as perception of risk.

Cognition↗