PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 11164975

Professional toxicology societies: web based resources.

Abstract

The number of digital tools available for use by researchers continues to rapidly increase as does the quantity of information available on the web. However, judging the reliability, quality and timeliness of this information is not always easy. One source of information about the profession of toxicology comes from the web sites of the various professional organizations that exist in this field. Given the broad nature of toxicology, there are a large number of such organizations. Some serve broader segments of the profession, while others have a more narrow focus. The web sites they have created are similarly variable, although there are some consistencies in the type of information that is provided. These include mission statements, information on joining the organization, and details on their annual meetings. There is also a consistent decision by these sites not to provide toxicologic information per se, although links to sites that do contain such information are occasionally provided. Overall, the information and tools provided by professional toxicology societies around the world appears to be similar in both quantity and quality to other scientific organizations. It is also apparent that this information is rapidly evolving and will likely be much different within the next 5 years.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J P Kehrer, J Mirsalis. 2001-01-12. Professional toxicology societies: web based resources.. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0300-483x(00)00341-3

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Assessing the American Board of Orthodontics objective grading system: digital vs plaster dental casts.

INTRODUCTION: The purposes of this study were to determine whether the American Board of Orthodontics objective grading system (ABO OGS) can be assessed accurately from digital dental casts and whether there are statistical differences between digital and plaster dental casts in scoring the ABO OGS. METHODS: Thirty posttreatment plaster dental casts were selected and scanned by OrthoCAD (Cadent, Carlstadt, NJ) to produce 30 corresponding digital dental casts. The plaster and digital casts were compared by using the criteria of the ABO OGS. Because the data were ordinal, a nonparametic statistical analysis was used. RESULTS: The Wilcoxon test for paired samples showed significant differences between the plaster and digital casts for occlusal contacts, occlusal relationships, and total scores (P <.05). No significant differences were found for alignment, marginal ridges, overjet, and interproximal contacts. Buccolingual inclination was not included in this study because of inability to perform proper measurements with the OrthoCAD program. Mean differences of points deducted ranged from .03 point for marginal ridges to 5.07 points for the total score. The variable with the most points deducted related to occlusal relationships, and the fewest points were deducted for interproximal contacts. CONCLUSIONS: Based on this study, the current OrthoCAD program (version 2.2) was not adequate for scoring all parameters as required by the ABO OGS.

Certification↗