PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 11166093

Physiological response to ECT stimulus dose.

Abstract

For a physiological effect to be useful to regulate the electrical stimulus dose used in electroconvulsive therapy (ECT), it must show sensitivity to the stimulus dose. In the analogy of using blood drug concentration to regulate drug dosage, this concentration must be sensitive to the dose. Accordingly, we examined the sensitivity of several physiological effects to ECT stimulus dose. Previously no substantial sensitivity of physiological effects was found when generally effective ECT methods were used. EEG post-ictal suppression, recruitment phase duration, wave form regularity and spike-and-wave frequencies, peak seizure heart rate (HR), and several types of seizure duration were measured with standard and higher dose stimuli given on separate days to 24 subjects. Left frontal to right temporal asymmetric bilateral stimulus placement was applied. Peak HR (P=0.007, t=2.7) and EEG recruitment phase duration (P=0.04, t=1.9) varied with stimulus dose, by 12 beats/min and 1.3 s, respectively. Only peak HR (P=0.02, t=2.2) varied with stimulus dose (by 6 beats/min) when subjects who showed only EEG seizure but no motor seizures were excluded. Subjects who maintained peak HR near their individual maximum values received fewer ECTs than other subjects (P=0.00003, t=5.20); this greater efficacy suggests that the peak HR reflects clinical efficacy as well as stimulus dose. In addition to EEG measurements, peak HR is a candidate to measure ECT seizure quality and provide feedback for stimulus dose regulation.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

C M Swartz. 2000-12-27. Physiological response to ECT stimulus dose.. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0165-1781(00)00234-1

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Determination of midazolam and 1'-hydroxymidazolam by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry in plasma of patients undergoing methadone maintenance treatment.

A rapid, sensitive and selective LC-MS method was developed for the simultaneous determination of midazolam (MDZ) and 1'-hydroxymidazolam (1'-OHMDZ) in plasma taken from 54 patients undergoing methadone maintenance therapy, most of whom were multidrug users. Samples spiked with prazepam, the internal standard, and were extracted into diethyl ether. Compounds were separated on a Phenomenex Luna C(18) column and a mobile phase of acetonitrile-ammonium acetate buffer (10 mM, pH 4.7) (52:48, v/v) at a flow-rate of 1 ml/min. The limit of detection was 0.65 and 0.68 (ng/ml) for MDZ and 1'-OHMDZ, respectively. Within-day relative standard deviations were less than 8%.

Adjuvants, Anesthesia↗

Comparison of fentanyl-bupivacaine or midazolam-bupivacaine mixtures with plain bupivacaine for caudal anaesthesia in children.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the intensity and effectiveness of 0.75 ml.kg-1 bupivacaine 0.25% with the addition of fentanyl or midazolam for caudal block in children undergoing inguinal herniorrhaphy. METHODS: Seventy-five children were allocated randomly to three groups to receive a caudal block with either 0.25% bupivacaine with fentanyl 1 microg.kg(-1) (group BF) or with midazolam 50 microg.kg(-1) (group BM) or bupivacaine alone (group B) after induction of anaesthesia. Haemodynamic parameters, degree of pain, additional analgesic requirements and side-effects were evaluated. RESULTS: The mean systolic arterial pressure at 10, 20, 30 min after caudal block was higher in group B compared with groups BF and BM. Mean intraoperative heart rate was lower in group BF than the other groups. Adequate analgesia was obtained in all patients (100%) in group BF, 23 patients (92%) in group BM and 21 patients (84%) in group B (P > 0.05). The time to recovery to an Aldrete score of 10 was significantly shorter in group B than group BM (P < 0.05). Although not significant, it was also shorter in group B than group BF. There was no difference in additional analgesic requirements between the groups in the first 24 h. Sedation score was higher in the midazolam group at 60 and 90 min postoperatively than the other groups. CONCLUSIONS: Caudal block with 0.75 ml.kg(-1) 0.25% bupivacaine and 50 microg.kg(-1) midazolam or 1 microg.kg(-1) fentanyl provides no further analgesic advantages to bupivacaine alone when administered immediately after induction of anaesthesia in children undergoing unilateral inguinal herniorrhaphy.

Adjuvants, Anesthesia↗