PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 11188451

Improving qualitative proposals: common problem areas.

L M Connelly·L H Yoder
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Advanced practice nurses conducting clinical research may decide to use qualitative methods. These types of studies also are now receiving more positive consideration for funding than they have in the past. When writing a proposal for research projects, investigators new to qualitative research frequently have misconceptions about this type of research and the assumptions on which the research is based. These misconceptions lead to problems within the proposals that make it difficult for reviewers to evaluate adequately the research plan. In this article, the authors outline problems frequently observed in qualitative proposals, offer advice on how to correct the problems, and provide some examples from their own funded proposals.

Explore related subjects

Clinical Nursing ResearchData Interpretation, StatisticalHumansResearch Support as TopicSpecialties, NursingWritingJournal ArticleReview

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

L M Connelly, L H Yoder. 2000. Improving qualitative proposals: common problem areas.. https://doi.org/10.1097/00002800-200003000-00009

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2003

Ethological methods to develop nursing knowledge.

Researchers from various fields use ethological methods to systematically observe, describe, and measure animal and human nonverbal behavior. The purpose of this article is to argue that their application in nursing will benefit development of descriptive-level knowledge about complex behavioral phenomena. To advance the argument for applying these methods in nursing, we examine the compatibility of the philosophical assumptions underlying ethology with nursing, assess if ethology can help nursing achieve some of its aims, and determine the benefits of using ethology when observation of a phenomenon is required. Neonatal pain is used to illustrate how ethology can be used to develop descriptive-level nursing knowledge and midrange theory.

Clinical Nursing Research↗
PubMed2003

An alternative paradigm for clinical nursing research: an exemplar.

Effectiveness research is undertaken to evaluate the effects of interventions in achieving desired outcomes when tested in the real-world conditions of everyday practice. Although the randomized clinical trial (RCT) is considered the gold standard for effectiveness research, its feasibility, generalizability, and the clinical utility of its results are being questioned. This state of the science prompted the call for a paradigm shift, characterized by alternative methods for clinical research. The alternative methods attempt to account for clinical realities when conducting research, with the goal of minimizing discrepancies in the perspective and assumptions underlying practice and research. In this article a theory-driven approach to intervention evaluation is presented as a viable alternative paradigm for clinical research. The application of this approach demands changes in four aspects of research: participant selection criteria, assignment to treatment options, delivery of the intervention, and selection of outcome measures. The changes are discussed at the conceptual level and illustrated with examples from an ongoing multisite study aimed at determining the usefulness of this theory-driven approach to intervention evaluation.

Clinical Nursing Research↗