PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 11188559

Nurse practitioners and physicians: a collaborative practice.

Abstract

The rapid evolution of health care delivery within the United States has created increased opportunities for nurse practitioners (NPs) to work in a variety of challenging advanced practice roles and to impact the quality of health care. The NP role was originally developed to meet a perceived shortage of primary care physicians, especially for underserved populations. Today, NPs work in various fields, such as geriatrics and women's and family health care, as well as in various systems such as private practice and health maintenance organizations. Effective collaboration with physician colleagues will promote improved communication, health care management, and positive health outcomes. Barriers to effective collaboration are reimbursement, territorialism, and role confusion on part of the health care team and the general public.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J Neale. 1999. Nurse practitioners and physicians: a collaborative practice.. https://doi.org/10.1097/00002800-199909000-00014

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Cooperation through indirect reciprocity: image scoring or standing strategy?

Theorists have only recently shown that cooperation through indirect reciprocity can evolve. The first modelling approach favoured a mechanism called image scoring. Helping someone increases one's image score, whereas refusing to help reduces it. The evolutionary outcome was a discriminator image scoring strategy that helps everybody who has, for example, a positive image score. Two experimental studies with humans found results that were compatible with discriminator image scoring. However, a new analysis of other theorists, based on another population structure, has cast doubts on the evolutionary stability of strategies using the recipient's score as a sole basis for decision. The new theoretical study confirmed that a strategy aiming at "good standing" has superior properties and easily beats image scoring. An individual loses good standing by failing to help a recipient in good standing, whereas failing to help recipients who lack good standing does not damage the standing of a potential donor (but would reduce his image score). The present empirical study with 23 groups of seven human subjects each was designed for distinguishing between the two proposed mechanisms experimentally. The results differed strongly from standing strategies, which might demand too much working memory capacity, but were compatible with image scoring or a similar strategy to a large extent. Furthermore, donors of constant "NO players" compensated for their refusing to help these players by being more generous to others.

Cooperative Behavior↗