PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 11190891

[CancerNet online--a contribution to improving oncologic management].

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We started the CancerNet project to evaluate the suitability of the internet to improve the quality of health care and the physician-patient relationship by offering worldwide access to high quality guidelines and standards. METHODS: Since early 1994 we have offered access to the National Cancer Institute's guidelines for current cancer therapy to physicians via WWW. These guidelines, which are provided by the NCI in accordance with the rules for evidence-based medicine, are accompanied by general information for non-professionals. Every month about 500 text-documents are HTML-encoded, linked together to about 10,000 abstracts available online as well as to MEDLINE. CancerNet is offered in English, Spanish, and German (only patient information) (http://www.meb.uni-bonn.de/cancernet/). RESULTS: From analyzing log files and user surveys in 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999, and 2000, we know that offering guidelines and patient information via the web fits most expectations of our users (physicians, health professionals, scientists, and laymen) on a high quality medical information service. Since 1994 nearly 2 million users, including more than 200,000 physicians, used our service. About 95% rated our service excellent or good.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

G Quade, B Burde, S Zenker, A Goldschmidt. 2000. [CancerNet online--a contribution to improving oncologic management].. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2000-10093

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Probability estimation when some observations are grouped.

This paper considers the use of additional questions for decreasing survey non-response rates and an approach for estimating a probability based on the results obtained. In a survey, the respondents are asked to answer an original question and follow-up questions, where the answers for the follow-up questions are grouped answers for the original question. For example, respondents are asked to provide an exact number of incidents, but in cases of 'Do not know' or 'Refuse' responses, they are subsequently asked to pick an answer from a less specific categorical scale. The new estimator obtains smaller variance asymptotically and does not depend on a distribution family. This method is applied to income questions in a survey regarding injury prevention and behaviours. Another application is survey data on intimate partner violence, where some amendments were applied for incorporating post-stratification weights and for using non-random grouping. For additional illustration, an example of parameter estimation on artificially generated data is presented.

Data Collection↗