PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 11194695

Implementing a dietary intervention in primary care practice: a process evaluation.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Physicians acknowledge the need to advise their patients about dietary habits, but they may not have the training or tools to do this efficiently. In the context of a randomized trial, we investigated the feasibility of enlisting physicians to implement a dietary intervention in the primary care setting. METHODS: Physicians from 14 primary care practices were assigned via randomization to introduce a self-help booklet to promote dietary change at routine appointments. Delivery of the booklet was recorded by these intervention physicians at the clinic appointment; intervention participants were asked 3 months later in a telephone interview about whether they received and used the booklet. RESULTS: According to physician documentation, 95% of intervention participants who kept an appointment (n = 935) received the booklet; among participants completing a 3-month interview (n = 890), 96% reported the same. However, only about 50% of participants reported receiving the booklet from their physician; the remainder received the booklet from other clinic staff. Overall, 93% reported reading at least part of the booklet. Use of the booklet varied little whether it was delivered by a physician or staff person, but it was more likely to be read as time spent discussing the booklet increased. CONCLUSIONS: Physician cooperation and evidence of intervention effectiveness support the use of primary care for the delivery of interventions to change diet; training the entire health team and repeating dietary advice at subsequent visits may improve the success of such interventions.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

D Lazovich, S J Curry, S A Beresford, A R Kristal, E H Wagner. Implementing a dietary intervention in primary care practice: a process evaluation.. https://doi.org/10.4278/0890-1171-15.2.118

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

National diet and nutrition surveys: the British experience.

OBJECTIVE: The National Diet and Nutrition Surveys (NDNS) are a series of government-funded surveys of food intake, nutrient intake and nutritional status of individuals, undertaken to support nutritional policy and risk assessment. This paper summarises a review that considered the extent to which NDNS met the needs of users and suggested options for the future. The Food Standards Agency has since progressed favoured options. This paper aims to help others wishing to obtain this type of information within their own populations. DESIGN: A detailed questionnaire was used to probe use of data and gather opinions from users, producers and managers of the NDNS. It asked about general information needs from NDNS and changes that might be made. This was followed by a two-day workshop which included discussion of the main issues and the generation of 19 possible future options for consideration by the Agency. RESULTS: Options to improve effectiveness included methods to prioritise breadth and depth of coverage and possible ways of improving response and compliance. Strategies to make surveys more efficient and timely, such as adopting a rolling programme, disaggregating survey components, integrating with other studies and improving data access, were also suggested. A rolling programme, in which data are collected continuously, was the favoured option to address some of the concerns and a strategy is now in place to achieve this. CONCLUSIONS: There is widespread support for the NDNS from its users. There is no alternative source for such high-quality data on food and nutrient consumption and nutritional status and physical measurements in the same individuals. Useful information, such as the potential value of using a rolling programme from the outset, can be gained from this British experience by others wishing to measure food and nutrient intakes and status in their own populations.

Diet Surveys↗

Fitness-for-purpose of dietary survey duration: a case-study with the assessment of exposure to ochratoxin A.

The duration of food consumption survey may have a marked effect on estimates of usual nutrient intakes in individuals and groups. This arises from a high degree of within-person variability in food intakes, primarily on a day-to-day basis. Both the level of observation-populations versus individuals-and the desirable level of precision decide upon the 'fitness-for-purpose' of dietary survey duration. Though similar from a methodological standpoint, the question was rarely addressed in the case of non-nutrients. Our work aims at estimating the number of days of food records needed for the assessment of usual intakes of food chemicals as a function of research purpose. Focusing on the French population exposure to food mycotoxin ochratoxin A, we implement a range of well-established methods borrowed from the field of nutrient intakes assessment. Our results on OTA show that: (a) at the population level, as low as three days give satisfactory distributional estimates; yet, the implementation of variance reduction methods is of particular relevance when higher percentiles of exposure are at stake; (b) the estimation of individual usual intakes based on food records is behind practical possibilities, which calls for alternative options such as biomarkers of exposure.

Diet Surveys↗

[The toxic elements content of dietary supplements].

The article presents data on the toxic elements content of the dietary supplements (DS). The priority DS groups containing relatively high levels of each contaminant were picked out. The evidences of investigating DS consumption for the further contaminant intake counts were given.

Diet Surveys↗