PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 11227207

Differences between two transpalatal arch systems upon first-, second-, and third-order bending activation.

H Hoederath·C Bourauel·D Drescher
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Transpalatal arches are used in passive mode to improve anchor-age and in activated mode to achieve single tooth movement or movement of segments of teeth in first-, second- and third-order. Clinically it seems that the commonly used palatal arches of the Goshgarian type (here in the MIA system) as well as the precision TMA lingual arches of the Burstone system are not equally suitable for all kinds of activations. Using the Orthodontic Measurement and Simulation System (OMSS) the force systems and the efficacy of activated arches of both systems were examined in an experimental study with respect to different malpositions. The following first-, second- and third-order activations were chosen: symmetrical expansion and compression up to 4 mm, symmetrical distal rotation up to 15 degrees, unilateral distal tipping of 15 degrees and symmetrical buccal root torque up to 10 degrees. Attachments of the MIA system (MIA Rotation Lingual Sheaths, 0.072" x 0.036") and of the Burstone system (precision lingual hinge cap, 0.032" x 0.032", unused and a pair after a 4-week introral application period) were measured. Lingual arches made of 0.036" round stainless steel wire (MIA) and 0.032" x 0.032" TMA (Burstone system) were prepared with a height of 18 mm and a width of 30 mm. First-order activation bends (expansion and compression) of the MIA palatal arches caused forces up to 4.4 N compared to 1.8 N of the TMA arches, due to the lower load/deflection rate of the latter. The malpositions were corrected effectively by both systems. Due to the higher stiffness the moments delivered by the MIA palatal arches (39 Nmm) were higher in distal rotation compared to those of the TMA arches (14 Nmm) and the correction was more effective. In second-order activations (tipping) the MIA system delivered no or only small moments because of the curved shape of the attachments. A correction of only 30% was achieved compared to 80% with the Burstone system. In third-order activations, in contrast, the Burstone attachments caused considerable loss of torque. This was obviously due to the strong deformation of the slot by the intraoral loading. If it were possible to improve the dimensional stability of the hinge cap, all corrections carried out with the Burstone TMA system would involve distinctly smaller forces and moments than the MIA system but would still ensure good effectiveness.

Explore related subjects

Activator AppliancesBiomechanical PhenomenaHumansMicroscopy, Electron, ScanningOrthodontic WiresPalateTooth Movement TechniquesComparative StudyJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

H Hoederath, C Bourauel, D Drescher. 2001. Differences between two transpalatal arch systems upon first-, second-, and third-order bending activation.. https://doi.org/10.1007/pl00001919

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2001

Feeding skills and growth after one year of intraoral appliance therapy in moderately dysphagic children with cerebral palsy.

We determined changes in functional feeding skills and growth after one year of intraoral appliance therapy in dysphagic children. Twenty children, 4.2-13.1 years of age (average 8.3 +/- 0.9 years), participated in this study. Children wore the appliance daily. Phase I of treatment (6 months) aimed primarily at stabilizing the mandible and phase II aimed at facilitating ingestive skills. A control period of 6 months preceded treatment. Functional feeding skills improved significantly during phase I beyond changes seen during the control period. Further significant improvement occurred in chewing during phase II. All children significantly gained weight (kg) during the control period, as well as during the two treatment phases. This weight gain was sufficient for children to maintain their growth trajectory. There was also significant growth in height (cm). This growth spurt was characterized by marginal catch-up. Jaw stabilization was a major contributor to the significant improvement in functional feeding skills. Weight gain cannot be attributed to intervention because it occurred during the control period and was the same in magnitude through both treatment phases. However, it permitted a period of growth in stature which previously had been described only after tube feeding.

Activator Appliances↗
PubMed2001

Effective condylar growth and chin position changes in activator treatment: a cephalometric roentgenographic study.

Effective condylar growth (a summation of condylar remodeling, glenoid fossa remodeling, and condylar position changes within the fossa) and its influence on the position of the chin was analyzed in 40 class II, division I malocclusions treated successfully with activators. Additionally, the amount of mandibular rotation was assessed. Lateral head films in habitual occlusion from before and after an average treatment period of 2.6 years were evaluated. The Bolton Standards (32 untreated individuals with ideal occlusion) served as controls. Two different treatment effects were evaluated: overall growth change and treatment effects (overall growth changes minus age-related Bolton values). In comparison with the Bolton group, the activator patients exhibited an increase in the amount of vertical effective condylar growth (3.0 mm; P < .001), a decrease in the amount of sagittal effective condylar growth (0.6 mm; P < .05), and an increase in the amount of vertical development of the chin (1.8 mm; P < .001). No group differences could be found for sagittal development of the chin. In the Bolton group, the mandible rotated posteriorly, and in the activator group it rotated anteriorly (2.7 degrees; P < .001). The present investigation revealed that effective condylar growth can be increased and the chin position can be changed by activator treatment. Thus activator treatment induces skeletal changes, although not always in the desired (sagittal) therapeutic direction.

Activator Appliances↗