PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 1123097

Editorial: Group vs solo practice.

Abstract

The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

R H Morgan. 1975. Editorial: Group vs solo practice.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1123097/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

CompreLink--a physician to physician communication network.

The Cleveland Clinic Foundation has developed a physician to physician communication network designed to meet the needs of their affiliate physicians--physicians who do not have admitting privileges at the Cleveland Clinic Hospital. This paper provides an overview of the CompreLink network as it exists today, as well as a glimpse into some of their plans for network expansion and development.

Group Practice

Physician satisfaction in a managed care environment.

BACKGROUND: The professional literature suggests that changes toward the bureaucratization of medical practice have led to increasing job dissatisfaction, especially in primary care. To investigate this claim, we surveyed physicians in Dane County, Wisconsin, who practice in a bureaucratic setting. Dane County has experienced essentially a demise in independent practice, ie, most physicians practice in organizational settings where expenses and total patient income are pooled. About 85% of physicians have joined one of the six competing health maintenance organizations (HMOs). METHODS: In 1986 all 850 physicians in Dane County were surveyed to determine their perceptions of clinical freedom, satisfaction with income, status in their profession, autonomy, resources, and professional relations, and their overall satisfaction. RESULTS: We found that over 69% of primary care physicians were very satisfied or satisfied with their practices overall compared with 68% of physicians in all specialties. Differences between family practice and other primary care specialties were not statistically significant. Our regression analysis showed that only for satisfaction with income were responses from primary care physicians significantly different from those of physicians in surgical specialties. Perceptions of clinical autonomy and specific organizational settings were more important to predicting satisfaction. Also, age and sex contributed to differences in satisfaction with resources and status, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that satisfaction can be fairly high for primary care physicians in bureaucratic settings similar to that of Dane County.

Group Practice