PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 11232251

Commitment to change: a strategy for promoting educational effectiveness.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Short lecture-based courses are the most common format used in continuing medical education (CME) activities, yet they are relatively ineffective for inducing behavioral changes. This study investigates the effectiveness of the commitment to change strategy for identifying behavioral changes stimulated by such a short course. METHODS: Attendees at an annual 3-day lecture-based course voluntarily committed to instituting up to four changes in their practice. Those who made commitments were surveyed 1 month following the conference. RESULTS: Fifty-four percent of the intended changes had already been accomplished. There was no relationship between the audience's post-lecture evaluation scores for achieving the learning objectives compared to the number of changes committed to by the attendees. IMPLICATIONS: An unanticipated finding was the differential participation between those professions that have more autonomy (physicians and advanced practice nurses) versus those professions with less (nurses and physician's assistants). Insufficient elapsed time was the nearly universal limitation for initiating change. Encouraging participants to make a commitment to change holds a great deal of potential for both stimulating and documenting behavioral outcomes resulting from CME activities.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J L Dolcourt. 2000. Commitment to change: a strategy for promoting educational effectiveness.. https://doi.org/10.1002/chp.1340200304

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Providing cancer services to remote and rural areas: consensus study.

There is controversy about how cancer care should be provided to patients in remote and rural areas. The aim of this project was to measure consensus among health professionals who treat rural patients with cancer about priorities for cancer care. A modified Delphi process was used. Of 78 health professionals in Grampian, 62 responded (79%). Of 49 items suggested, there was agreement on 26 (53%), encompassing fast access to diagnosis, high-quality specialist treatment, and well-coordinated delivery of care with good and fast communication and effective team working between all health professionals involved. Specialist oncology nurses in local hospitals were considered a priority along with good facilities, accommodation, and transport for patients. There was no agreement on the best location for chemotherapy (local or central). The only large difference of opinion between participants based in primary and secondary care concerned chemotherapy provision at local community hospitals (primary care was in favour, hospital practitioners against, P&<0.001). In making their decisions, participants took problems of access into account, but were also concerned with quality of care and feasibility in the current health service. Our findings show that more evidence is needed regarding the balance of risks and benefits of local chemotherapy provision. Overall, however, there is agreement on many principles for cancer care that could be translated into practice.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗