PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 11234858

Physician satisfaction revisited.

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Nineteen US physicians were interviewed in 1987 to identify how they defined and addressed the changes facing them. Attitudes and problem-solving approaches of physicians who remained satisfied were compared with those deemed dissatisfied. In this ten-year follow-up study, the original subjects were re-contacted and asked to describe changes in their practices, and other questions regarding their professional lives. They were rated by themselves and the authors for satisfaction. Eighteen responded and could be rearranged into three groups by ratings of satisfaction. Representative responses delineate each group and explore various aspects differentiating responses within the grouping. CONCLUSION: past satisfaction with medical practice is no predictor of current satisfaction. Only those who either embraced change or found a means of escape from the issues facing them earlier were judged satisfied. The majority describe strategies to reduce fatigue, and to maintain some control over their professional lives.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

D C Dunstone, H R Reames. 2001. Physician satisfaction revisited.. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0277-9536(00)00186-6

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

In the wake of hospital inquiries: impact on staff and safety.

Mishandled concerns about clinical standards resulted in whistleblowing in four Australian hospitals. Official inquiries followed with recommendations to improve patient safety. In the aftermath of the inquiries, common themes included loss of trust in management and among clinical colleagues, and loss of trust from patients and the community. Without first rebuilding trust, staff will not report mistakes or other concerns about safety. Successful implementation of patient safety procedures requires policies to stress the professional duty of staff to report concerns about colleagues when they believe there is a risk to patients.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗

Retrieving the ars moriendi tradition.

North Atlantic culture lacks a commonly shared view on dying well that helps the dying, their social environment and caregivers to determine their place and role, interpret death and deal with the process of ethical deliberation. What is lacking nowadays, however, has been part of Western culture in medieval times and was known as the ars moriendi (art of dying well) tradition. In this paper an updated version of this tradition is presented that meets the demands of present day secularized and multiform society. Five themes are central to the new art of dying: autonomy and the self, pain control and medical intervention, attachment and relations, life balance and guilt, death and afterlife. The importance of retrieving the ancient ars moriendi outreaches the boundaries of palliative medicine, since it deals with issues that play a central role in every context of medical intervention and treatment.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗