PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 11240653

Reduced immunologic cell performance as a prognostic parameter for advanced cervical cancer.

Abstract

The proliferative response of lymphocytes to mitogens is known to be decreased in cancer patients; this phenomenon is thought to play an important role in disease progression, but it has not been studied as a prognostic factor in cervical cancer patients receiving treatment. Fourteen patients with advanced cervical cancer submitted to chemotherapy with cis-platinum (100 mg/m2/cycle) and bleomycin (30 mg/cycle) over three cycles every 4 weeks were evaluated. Mean follow-up time was 30 months. The following laboratory tests carried out on peripheral blood lymphocytes collected before and at the end of chemotherapy were used as prognostic factors: proliferative response of lymphocytes to phytohemagglutinin (PHA) and stimulated with interleukin 12 (IL-12), capacity of gamma interferon production (IFN-gamma), and variations in memory T cell (CD45-RO) and naive T cell (CD45-RA) subsets. A clear correlation was obtained between response to treatment, survival rates, and PHA-induced proliferative response. A significant difference was observed in the number of CD45-RO lymphocyte at the pre-chemotherapy period and IFN-gamma production at the post-chemotherapy period in the group of good responders to treatment. The use of IL-12 produced a leveling in both groups for lymphocyte proliferation, i.e., a recovery from the deficiency presented by the lymphocyte of the poor responders group. The parameters of immunologic assays, especially proliferative response, appears to be correlated with prognosis and survival rates and therefore are good discriminating factors for the selection of groups of patients that will benefit from this type of treatment. IL-12 seems to play an important role in the regulation of the antitumor immune response and should be considered for therapeutic use.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

H. R. C. Marana, J. S. Silva, J. M. Andrade, S. Bighetti. 2000. Reduced immunologic cell performance as a prognostic parameter for advanced cervical cancer.. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1438.2000.00004.x

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Effectiveness of high-dose versus standard-dose influenza vaccines against hospitalisation according to frailty risk: a prespecified analysis of the randomised trial DANFLU-2.

BACKGROUND: Frailty is a major risk factor for influenza-related complications and can influence vaccine effectiveness. We aimed to assess the relative vaccine effectiveness (rVE) of high-dose (HD-IIV) versus standard-dose inactivated influenza vaccine (SD-IIV) in older adults aged 65 years or older according to frailty risk. METHODS: This study was a prespecified analysis of DANFLU-2, an open-label, individually randomised trial, conducted in Denmark during three consecutive influenza seasons (2022-23, 2023-24, and 2024-25). Adults aged 65 years or older were randomised (1:1) to the HD-IIV or SD-IIV group. The primary endpoint was hospitalisation for influenza or pneumonia. Frailty was defined according to the validated Hospital Frailty Risk Score (HFRS) based on ICD-10 codes within 10 years before randomisation. Participants were stratified into three HFRS categories, namely low (<5 points), intermediate (5-15 points), and high (>15 points) frailty risk. The rVE of HD-IIV versus SD-IIV against the primary endpoint was assessed across prespecified HFRS categories and treating HFRS as a continuous variable. Pearson's chi-square test was used to compare safety events across frailty risk groups and randomisation groups. FINDINGS: Among 332&#x2009;438 randomised participants (mean age 73&#xb7;7 years [SD 5&#xb7;8]; 161&#x2009;538 [48&#xb7;6%] were female), 276&#x2009;173 (83&#xb7;1%) had low frailty risk, 52&#x2009;395 (15&#xb7;8%) had intermediate frailty risk, and 3861 (1&#xb7;2%) had high frailty risk. The primary endpoint of hospitalisation for influenza or pneumonia occurred in 1424 (0&#xb7;5%) of 276&#x2009;173 participants with low frailty risk, 761 (1&#xb7;5%) of 52&#x2009;395 with intermediate frailty risk, and 163 (4&#xb7;2%) of 3861 with high frailty risk (relative risk [RR] for intermediate vs low frailty risk 2&#xb7;8 [95% CI 2&#xb7;6-3&#xb7;1]; RR for high vs low frailty risk 8&#xb7;2 [7&#xb7;0-9&#xb7;6]). HFRS as a continuous variable significantly modified the effect of HD-IIV versus SD-IIV against the primary endpoint with higher rVE estimates with increasing HFRS (pinteraction=0&#xb7;020). The rVE was 0&#xb7;2% (95% CI -10&#xb7;8 to 10&#xb7;2) among those with low frailty risk, 13&#xb7;1% (-0&#xb7;4 to 24&#xb7;8) among those with intermediate frailty risk, and 19&#xb7;9% (-10&#xb7;3 to 42&#xb7;1) among those with high frailty risk. No significant interaction was observed when HFRS was assessed according to the prespecified categorical frailty groups (pinteraction=0&#xb7;17). The proportion of participants with at least one serious adverse event increased across frailty risk groups (13&#x2009;366 [4&#xb7;8%] of 275&#x2009;795 for low frailty risk, 5475 [10&#xb7;5%] of 52&#x2009;315 for intermediate frailty risk, and 777 [20&#xb7;2%] of 3850 for high frailty risk; p<0&#xb7;0001), with similar proportions of serious adverse events in the HD-IIV and SD-IIV groups for each frailty risk group. INTERPRETATION: Among adults aged 65 years or older in Denmark, frailty risk might modify the effects of HD-IIV versus SD-IIV against hospitalisation for influenza or pneumonia, with higher rVE estimates with increasing frailty risk. These findings might support considering high-dose influenza vaccines for frail older adults. However, effect modification was not evident when frailty was assessed using prespecified categorical subgroups, and subgroup-specific estimates were imprecise, with 95% CIs crossing the null. These results should be considered exploratory, warranting further investigation. FUNDING: The DANFLU-2 trial was funded by Sanofi.

Journal Article↗