PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 11241707

Correcting partial volume artifacts of the arterial input function in quantitative cerebral perfusion MRI.

Abstract

To quantify cerebral perfusion with dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI (DSC-MRI), one needs to measure the arterial input function (AIF). Conventionally, one derives the contrast concentration from the DSC sequence by monitoring changes in either the amplitude or the phase signal on the assumption that the signal arises completely from blood. In practice, partial volume artifacts are inevitable because a compromise has to be reached between the temporal and spatial resolution of the DSC acquisition. As the concentration of the contrast agent increases, the vector of the complex blood signal follows a spiral-like trajectory. In the case of a partial-volume voxel, the spiral is located around the static contribution of the surrounding tissue. If the static contribution of the background tissue is disregarded, estimations of the contrast concentration will be incorrect. By optimizing the correspondence between phase information and amplitude information one can estimate the origin of the spiral, and thereupon correct for partial volume artifacts. This correction is shown to be accurate at low spatial resolutions for phantom data and to improve the AIF determination in a clinical example. Magn Reson Med 45:477-485, 2001.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

M J van Osch, E J Vonken, C J Bakker, M A Viergever. 2001. Correcting partial volume artifacts of the arterial input function in quantitative cerebral perfusion MRI.. https://doi.org/10.1002/1522-2594(200103)45%3A3%3C477%3A%3Aaid-mrm1063%3E3.0.co%3B2-4

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Striping artifact removal in VisiumHD data through nuclear counts modeling.

MOTIVATION: 10x Genomics VisiumHD enables spatial transcriptomics at 2 µm × 2 µm resolution but exhibits slide-specific, non-periodic striping artifacts due to lane-width variability. These multiplicative row/column effects distort bin total counts and can bias downstream analyses. The state-of-the-art destriping approach is the normalization procedure used as a preprocessing step in bin2cell; it applies sequential high-quantile row- then column-wise normalization, which is asymmetric and can introduce edge effects/macro-stripes and distortions of large-scale total-count structure. RESULTS: We propose a statistical destriping approach that leverages nuclei segmentation from the co-registered H&E image. Assuming transcript abundance is constant within each nucleus, we model bin counts with a negative binomial distribution whose mean is a product of a nucleus-specific concentration and row- and column-specific stripe-factors reflecting lane-width variation. We fit all parameters in a generalized linear modeling framework with cross-validated regularization on stripe-factors and iterative dispersion estimation, and use the fitted parameters to correct the observed counts into a destriped image. On synthetic data with known ground truth, our method improves stripe-factor estimation accuracy and reduces error in corrected counts relative to bin2cell and bin2cell-derived baselines. Across four public VisiumHD slides, it consistently lowers striping intensity while substantially better preserving biological signal present in the large-scale global count structure and avoiding the artifacts introduced by other methods. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: All source code and links to publicly available data used for this study are available at https://github.com/paolamalsot/destriping-GLM.

Artifacts↗

Impairment of echocardiographic acoustic window caused by breast implants.

Cosmetic breast implants are increasing in popularity. The presence of a breast implant overlying the anterior mediastinal space as a cause of impairment of the echocardiographic acoustic window has not been described previously. Here, we report three cases with significant impairment of echocardiographic acoustic window caused by breast implants. Clinicians should be aware of this interference and women should be informed of this dilemma before considering this cosmetic surgery.

Artifacts↗