PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 11244519

Atherectomy plus stenting: what do we gain?

Abstract

Coronary stents have improved the short and long-term outcomes of selected patients undergoing catheter-based coronary interventions. However, the use of these devices in complex coronary lesions has also created an incessant form of in-stent restenosis that still defies treatment. Plaque burden has been recognized as an important factor that may incite neo-intimal proliferation after stent implantation. Prospective non-randomized experience has shown that plaque removal prior to stent implantation using directional atherectomy is a promising approach to reduce restenosis in selected patients. However, the proof of concept awaits the results of the randomized trials. Ultimately, the clinical utility of this approach will depend upon: (1) further improvements on the current directional atherectomy device; (2) minimizing the incidence of non-Q-wave myocardial infarction with selective use of IIb-IIIa platelet receptor antagonists or distal protection devices; (3) targeting patients at high risk for restenosis in whom efficient debulking is feasible such as non-calcified lesions in vessels >2.75 mm and <3.5 mm in diameter that require long stents, aorto-ostial lesions, bifurcational lesions, and chronic total occlusions.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

I Moussa, J Moses, A Colombo. 2000. Atherectomy plus stenting: what do we gain?. https://doi.org/10.1053/siic.2000.0138

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Impact of platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor therapy on in-hospital outcomes and long-term survival following percutaneous coronary rotational atherectomy.

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous coronary rotational atherectomy (PCRA) is a potent stimulus of platelet activation and aggregation in vivo. For this reason, many patients undergoing PCRA are treated with platelet glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa inhibitors. However, there is limited data regarding the ability of GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors to reduce ischemic complications of PCRA and no data regarding their effect on long-term survival. METHODS: Data on 1138 consecutive patients undergoing PCRA in 5 hospitals in 1998-1999 were pooled and analyzed. Long-term survival was available for all 530 patients treated in 3 of the hospitals. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors were administered to 315 of 1138 (28%) PCRA patients. There was no difference in age, gender or race among patients treated with and without GP IIb/IIIa antagonists. The prevalence of hypertension, diabetes, renal insufficiency and peripheral vascular disease did not differ between groups. Unstable angina was more common among patients treated with GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors (45% vs. 38%, P = 0.036) Patients treated with GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors had lower ejection fractions (50% vs. 55%, P < 0.001) and more 3-vessel coronary disease (24% vs. 16%, P = 0.002). Angiographic success was over 99% in both groups (P = NS). The frequency of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) was slightly greater in GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor treated patients (3.8% vs. 2.2%, P = 0.126). At a mean follow-up of 3 years, mortality was 13.3% in the GP IIb/IIIa treated patients and 12% in the untreated patients (P = 0.224). On Cox proportional hazards analysis, treatment with a GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor was not significantly associated with increased survival (Hazard Ratio, 0.81, 95% Confidence Interval, 0.631-1.039, P = 0.098). These data do not indicate a significant association between GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor treatment during PCRA and MACE or survival. CONDENSED ABSTRACT: There is limited data regarding the ability of GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors to reduce ischemic complications of percutaneous coronary rotational atherectomy (PCRA) and no data regarding their effect on long-term survival. These data do not indicate a significant association between GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor treatment during PCRA and MACE or survival.

Atherectomy, Coronary↗

Management of calcified lesions in 2004.

Calcified lesions are encountered with increasing frequency in the catheterization laboratory. Percutaneous coronary interventions of calcified lesions are associated with a higher complication rate than percutaneous intervention on non-calcified lesions. The review focuses on current management strategies in the drug eluting stent era of this complex lesion subset. Evidence based approaches to treat calcified coronary lesions with balloon based and atherectomy devices as adjunctive modalities in the drug eluting stent era are discussed in this article.

Atherectomy, Coronary↗