PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 11248925

Laparoscopic ultrasonography.

Abstract

The use of laparoscopic ultrasonography (LUS) allows visualization of tissues beyond the two-dimensional laparoscopic picture, enhancing the amount and quality of information available to the surgeon. Linear-array transducers with frequencies of 7.5 to 10 MHz are typically used for LUS, employing B-mode scanning and color Doppler capability on probes with articulating tips. In general surgery, LUS has become a common adjunct to the intraoperative staging of upper gastrointestinal malignancy to determine resectability, avoiding unnecessary laparotomy. In urology, LUS appears to be a promising adjunct for four current procedures: difficult pelvic lymphocele marsupialization, renal cyst decortication, nephrolithotomy and other renal stone surgery, and cryotherapy of renal masses. The role of LUS during varicocelectomy is limited, and enthusiasm for this procedure is waning. Laparoscopic ultrasonography is a critical adjunct to renal cryoablation, a developmental procedure that currently lacks long-term data but is promising as therapy for small, incidentally detected renal masses. It appears that as laparoscopic urologic procedures continue to expand, so will the application of this promising operative imaging modality.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

S F Matin, I S Gill. 2001. Laparoscopic ultrasonography.. https://doi.org/10.1089/08927790150501006

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Uroscopy by Hippocrates and Theophilus: prognosis versus diagnosis.

PURPOSE: In antiquity the visual examination of urine (uroscopy) is well documented. Uroscopy gradually evolved from a prognostic indicator to a diagnostic tool. Comparison of the uses of uroscopy by Hippocrates (400 BC) and Theophilus (700 AD) illustrates this transformation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed medical and historical literature as well as the translated works of Hippocrates. RESULTS: Although Hippocrates was one of the first physicians to use urine to interpret human body functioning, urine was mainly used as a means for prognosis and prediction of outcomes of illness. In his text De Urinis Theophilus introduced an innovative doctrine and used uroscopy for diagnosis of illnesses. In this respect uroscopy became a paradigm for later diagnostic strategies and is considered an important milestone in the history of clinical diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: Hippocrates' writings displayed uroscopy used in examination of illness. However, he considered it in the context for accurate prognoses. Theophilus treated uroscopy in a sophisticated objective manner and attempted to use uroscopy in an orderly, systemic method to accurately diagnose illness. It was through these approaches to uroscopy that Theophilus became one of the physicians who contributed to the birth of medieval medical studies.

Diagnostic Techniques, Urological↗

[Non-invasive urodynamics in male patient].

PURPOSE: Pressure-flow studies are currently recognized as the criterion standard to quantify urethral obstruction and its consequence on detrusor contractility. These tests have some disadvantages: they are invasive, time-consuming and expensive and entail risk of disease for the patient. Less invasive methods have been proposed to give the same results without the disadvantages. In this study, we conducted a critical analysis of the devices and techniques and their results. METHOD: After a brief reminder of the general behavior of the flow in an obstructed urethra, we describe the main non-invasive techniques: penile urethral compression-release (PCR), cuffs, and condoms. Using the VBN method, we tried to quantify data from these techniques to specify the relation with the usual parameters of bladder outlet obstruction. RESULTS: In the absence of brisk change of the flow rate, the voiding phases are easily analyzed. With minor corrections, recorded external or cuff pressures could be used in the ICS nomogram; unfortunately, these pressures are greatly modified by perturbations of the nervous control. The spike of flow (due to urine storage in the urethra) observed at resumption of flow after each interruption presents mathematical difficulties for quantitative and reliable modeling but could give a consistent empirical interpretation. CONCLUSION: Of the reported non-invasive tests, all except PCR have an important instrumental heaviness and induce strong perturbations of the nervous control. If they cannot allow an accurate quantification of urethral obstruction and detrusor contractility, they could allow for classification of benign prostatic hypertrophy (BPH) patients. Despite the mathematical problems set by the theory of spikes, the empirical use of the spikes amplitude could perhaps be clinically useful.

Diagnostic Techniques, Urological↗