PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 11257073

Testing platelet activation with a shear-dependent platelet function test versus aggregation-based tests: relevance for monitoring long-term glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibition.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Tests developed to monitor glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa blockade do not properly reflect platelet function in vivo and need a baseline (pretreatment) value. Because GP IIb/IIIa is essential in platelet aggregation and thrombosis under shear conditions, a flow-dependent approach to monitor its inhibition can be used. METHODS AND RESULTS: We compared a test based on flow-dependent platelet deposition, the Cone and Platelet Analyzer (CPA), with in vitro platelet aggregometry and the Rapid Platelet Function Assay (RPFA) on platelet function after GP IIb/IIIa inhibition. In vitro, increasing concentrations of abciximab (0% to 100% receptor occupancy) were tested. Ex vivo, platelet function was monitored with the CPA and with aggregometry for up to 1 week after abciximab administration. The CPA was better correlated with the percentage of free GP IIb/IIIa receptors than was aggregometry or the RPFA. Only the RPFA, when expressed as a ratio over baseline (pretreatment), was comparable to the CPA. Ex vivo, the CPA, but not aggregometry, showed prolonged platelet inhibition with gradual recovery from GP IIb/IIIa receptor blockade in the first week after abciximab administration. CONCLUSIONS: Platelet function assessment by shear-induced deposition is a reliable test to monitor a wide range of GP IIb/IIIa inhibition. Its accuracy does not require a baseline reference. The effects of GP IIb/IIIa blockade on platelet function should be examined under high shear conditions.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J I Osende, V Fuster, E I Lev, D Shimbo, U Rauch, J D Marmur, M Richard, D Varon, J J Badimon. 2001-03-20. Testing platelet activation with a shear-dependent platelet function test versus aggregation-based tests: relevance for monitoring long-term glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibition.. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.103.11.1488

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Inhibitory effects of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa antagonists and aspirin on the release of soluble CD40 ligand during platelet stimulation.

BACKGROUND: Glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa antagonists inhibit platelet aggregation, an activity attributed to the clinical benefits of these drugs in settings that involve acute coronary thrombosis. However, platelet activation and subsequent aggregation are now known to cause the release of a soluble form of CD40 ligand (sCD40L), a prothrombotic and proinflammatory protein with GP IIb/IIIa binding activity and an established role in atherosclerotic lesion progression. The present study was designed to determine what effect GP IIb/IIIa antagonists have on the release of sCD40L. METHODS AND RESULTS: Doses of eptifibatide, abciximab, and tirofiban that inhibited platelet aggregation by at least 80% also inhibited sCD40L release in vitro (by 85%, 57%, and 80%, respectively). When platelets were stimulated with a thrombin receptor agonist, inhibition by GP IIb/IIIa antagonists occurred without affecting the release of betaTG, an alpha-granule protein. Unexpectedly, concentrations of the 3 antagonists that blocked aggregation by only 20% to 50% potentiated the release of sCD40L (by 19% to 26%). Platelets from aspirin-treated individuals were partially protected from sCD40L release, but only when the agonist was collagen, an affect augmented by the addition of GP IIb/IIIa antagonists. CONCLUSIONS: These studies suggest that the mechanisms responsible for the clinical benefits of GP IIb/IIIa antagonists (at doses that optimally inhibit aggregation) and of aspirin may not be limited to the inhibition of thrombosis through their blockade of platelet aggregation but may also involve the inhibition of inflammation and thrombosis through their blockade of sCD40L release. These studies also provide a mechanism by which suboptimal doses of GP IIb/IIIa antagonists may be proinflammatory.

Abciximab↗

The CAPTIM study.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Abciximab↗

Bivalirudin and provisional glycoprotein IIb/IIIa blockade compared with heparin and planned glycoprotein IIb/IIIa blockade during percutaneous coronary intervention: REPLACE-2 randomized trial.

CONTEXT: The direct thrombin inhibitor bivalirudin has been associated with better efficacy and less bleeding than heparin during coronary balloon angioplasty but has not been widely tested during contemporary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). OBJECTIVE: To determine the efficacy of bivalirudin, with glycoprotein IIb/IIIa (Gp IIb/IIIa) inhibition on a provisional basis for complications during PCI, compared with heparin plus planned Gp IIb/IIIa blockade with regard to protection from periprocedural ischemic and hemorrhagic complications. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: The Randomized Evaluation in PCI Linking Angiomax to Reduced Clinical Events (REPLACE)-2 trial, a randomized, double-blind, active-controlled trial conducted among 6010 patients undergoing urgent or elective PCI at 233 community or referral hospitals in 9 countries from October 2001 through August 2002. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomly assigned to receive intravenous bivalirudin (0.75-mg/kg bolus plus 1.75 mg/kg per hour for the duration of PCI), with provisional Gp IIb/IIIa inhibition (n = 2999), or heparin (65-U/kg bolus) with planned Gp IIb/IIIa inhibition (abciximab or eptifibatide) (n = 3011). Both groups received daily aspirin and a thienopyridine for at least 30 days after PCI. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary composite end point was 30-day incidence of death, myocardial infarction, urgent repeat revascularization, or in-hospital major bleeding; the secondary composite end point was 30-day incidence of death, myocardial infarction, or urgent repeat revascularization. RESULTS: Provisional Gp IIb/IIIa blockade was administered to 7.2% of patients in the bivalirudin group. By 30 days, the primary composite end point had occurred among 9.2% of patients in the bivalirudin group vs 10.0% of patients in the heparin-plus-Gp IIb/IIIa group (odds ratio, 0.92; 95% confidence interval, 0.77-1.09; P =.32). The secondary composite end point occurred in 7.6% of patients in the bivalirudin vs 7.1% of patients in the heparin-plus-Gp IIb/IIIa groups (odds ratio, 1.09; 95% confidence interval 0.90-1.32; P =.40). Prespecified statistical criteria for noninferiority to heparin plus Gp IIb/IIIa were satisfied for both end points. In-hospital major bleeding rates were significantly reduced by bivalirudin (2.4% vs 4.1%; P<.001). CONCLUSIONS: Bivalirudin with provisional Gp IIb/IIIa blockade is statistically not inferior to heparin plus planned Gp IIb/IIIa blockade during contemporary PCI with regard to suppression of acute ischemic end points and is associated with less bleeding.

Abciximab↗