PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 11272619

Biologic patterns of disability.

Abstract

We describe the use of a mathematical/statistical method (i.e., Rasch analysis) to elucidate biological patterns of disability present in the functional ability of persons undergoing medical rehabilitation. Two measures chosen for illustration are the FIM Instrument for inpatients and the Body Movement and Control (BMC) measure for outpatients. In order to meet the assumptions necessary for application of linear statistics to clinical measurement studies, Rasch analysis was used to transform ordinal scales into linear measures. Another unique feature of Rasch analysis is that it allows evaluation of the difficulty of items and the abilities of persons being tested, separately, on the same metric. Also, the difficulty represented by each item may be arranged along a hierarchy from easy to hard. The hierarchies of functional ability items are dependent upon the specific patterns of disability related to underlying pathophysiology. For inpatients, initial analyses of the 18 items of the FIM Instrument demonstrated separate hierarchies for the 13 motor items and for the 5 cognition items. Subsequent analyses demonstrated five distinct patterns for the 13 motor items of: brain dysfunction, orthopedic conditions, pain conditions, ambulatory spinal cord dysfunction, and wheelchair users with spinal cord dysfunction. Two patterns were identified for cognition: stroke with right body hemiparesis and all others. For outpatients, the BMC measure of physical functioning is used to demonstrate that pathophysiologic conditions are expected to affect the hierarchial pattern of items differently. This was noted to be the case for persons with lower body dysfunction, low back pain, and neck pain/upper limb dysfunction. Based upon the item responses, sitting, reaching and standing appear to represent items most useful for discriminating between the three conditions in terms of the functional consequences. Rasch analysis, among other advantages, enables investigation of the subtle relationships among items and is a useful method to evaluate underlying biological patterns of disability. A clinician, using a map that shows the expected relationships between item scores, may observe that a particular patient matches or does not match the expected pattern. Such insights may help the clinician in monitoring the responses of the patient to treatment efforts.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

C V Granger, R T Linn. 2000. Biologic patterns of disability.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11272619/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

A pooled analysis of quality of life measures and adverse events data in north central cancer treatment group lung cancer clinical trials.

BACKGROUND: In this pooled analysis, the authors examined correlations between single-item and multiple-item quality of life (QOL) measures and assessed the agreement between clinically significant changes in QOL and patient-reported adverse events (AE). METHODS: Data from 6 lung cancer clinical trials that involved 358 patients were pooled. All trials incorporated the Uniscale and 1 of 3 multiple-item assessments: the Functional Assessment for Cancer Therapy-Lung, the Lung Cancer Symptom Scale, or the Symptom Distress Scale. Spearman rank correlations and a Bland-Altman approach were used to assess agreement. Time-to-event analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: Correlations between the Uniscale and multiple-item assessments were substantial (correlation coefficient = 0.49-0.66). At least 1 10-point decline was reported in the Uniscale and multiple-item assessments by 58% of patients and 39% of patients, respectively. At least 1 severe AE (grade >or=3) was reported in 35% of patients postbaseline. The percent agreement between experiencing a severe AE and a decline in QOL was 48% and 59% for the Uniscale and multiple-item assessments, respectively. The median time to the first 10-point decline in QOL for the Uniscale and multiple-item assessments was 67 days and 142 days, respectively, and the median time to the first occurrence of a severe AE was 304 days. CONCLUSIONS: Information gleaned from the single-item Uniscale assessment was comparable to that gleaned from multiple-item global measures. There was moderate agreement between QOL and AE. A 10-point decline in QOL occurred earlier than Common Toxicity Criteria AE reporting. This suggests the need for inclusion of a QOL instrument in lung cancer clinical trials.

Activities of Daily Living↗

A pilot study of the vulnerable elders survey-13 compared with the comprehensive geriatric assessment for identifying disability in older patients with prostate cancer who receive androgen ablation.

BACKGROUND: Impairments in geriatric domains adversely affect health outcomes of the elderly. The Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) is a key component of the treatment approach for older cancer patients, but it is time consuming. In this pilot study, the authors evaluated the validity of a brief, functionally based screening tool, the Vulnerable Elders Survey-13 (VES-13), for identifying older patients with prostate cancer (PCa) with impairment in the oncology clinic setting. METHODS: Patients with PCa aged >or=70 years who actively were receiving androgen ablation treatment and who were followed within the clinics at the University of Chicago were eligible. Patients self-completed the VES-13 and CGA instruments and repeated the VES-13 1 month later. Physical performance and cognitive assessments were administered by a research assistant. RESULTS: Of 50 participating patients, 50% were identified as impaired by the VES-13 (score >or=3). Sixty percent of patients scored as impaired on >or=2 tests within the CGA, exhibiting deficits in multiple domains. The reliability of the VES-13 (Pearson correlation coefficient) was 0.92. The cut-off score of 3 on the VES-13 had 72.7% sensitivity and 85.7% specificity for CGA deficits and was highly predictive for identifying impairment (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.90). Patients who had mean VES-13 scores >or=3 performed significantly worse on evaluations of activities of daily living (P = .001), physical performance (P = .002), comorbidity (P = .004), and cognitive impairment (P = .003). CONCLUSIONS: Functional and cognitive impairments are highly prevalent among older patients with PCa who receive androgen ablation in oncology clinics. The current results indicated that the brief VES-13 performed nearly as well as a conventional CGA in detecting geriatric impairment in this population.

Activities of Daily Living↗

Health and motivation of elderly relocating to a suburban area in Japan.

In Japan, few studies have investigated the effects of moving residence among the elderly, despite the fact that Japanese elderly will be increasingly required to switch residence in the future. Here, we used representative sampling to examine the characteristics of elderly persons who had moved residence to a Tokyo suburb and compared results with those of non-moving residents of the suburb. Movers aged 65 years old or older who had relocated within the previous 2 years (movers) and residents aged 65 years old or older and had lived in the area longer than 5 years (non-movers) were surveyed by mail in 2004, with a focus on health and psychosocial measures. Compared with non-movers (N=117), movers (N=97) were more depressed, socially isolated, and fulfilled less active social roles among family members. The majority of movers had moved to find affordable housing or to live with or near family. Two factors preceded co-residence with family, namely retirement and imminent loss of functional independence. Our findings suggest that movers require community support to prevent social isolation, dependency and health declines.

Activities of Daily Living↗