PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 11293306

[Bioethics and toxicology].

Abstract

Human activity, involving nature and environment, alters the ecosystems in which we live; the question is whether this activity can be the source of risk and/or the origin of damages to human health. Risk assessment and risk management, connected with its protection, are not only a scientific and technical problem: hazards are real, but risks are social constructions. The role of toxicologists shows subjective features connected with different affiliations (industry, research, government); thus the assumptions and interpretations of risk assessment need to be integrated with wider psychological, social and political perspectives, in particular with ethical choices and values. Within public health personal subjectivities (genetic, biological and social) an adequate value should be given contrary to an abstract and collective entity which may erase and sacrifice subjectivities in favour of a statistical point of view. Public health should be considered as a whole of individual health conditions with regard to prevention, treatment and care.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

C Ricciardi. 2000. [Bioethics and toxicology].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11293306/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

High hopes and automatic escalators: a critique of some new arguments in bioethics.

Two protechnology arguments, the "hopeful principle" and the "automatic escalator", often used in bioethics, are identified and critically analysed in this paper. It is shown that the hopeful principle is closely related to the problematic precautionary principle, and the automatic escalator argument has close affinities to the often criticised empirical slippery slope argument. The hopeful principle is shown to be really hopeless as an argument, and automatic escalator arguments often lead nowhere when critically analysed. These arguments should therefore only be used with great caution.

Bioethics↗