PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 11296988

Introduction. Vasculitis.

Abstract

The vasculitides commonly create diagnostic and management problems, and a biopsy diagnosis of vasculitis usually does not stand alone in the proper medical management of a patient. Indeed, a conclusive diagnosis usually cannot be made without correlation with the patient's clinical history, physical findings, and/or angiographic findings. Nonetheless, a definitive diagnosis depends on histologic examination because few vasculitic syndromes have specific clinical and laboratory findings. Moreover, the histopathologic diagnosis depends on pathologist experience, tissue selection, sample size, chronologic age of the biopsied lesion(s), and effects of prior treatment. In this issue of Seminars in Diagnostic Pathology the important systemic vasculities are reviewed and updated. These include: polyarteritis nodosa, microscopic polyangiitis (microscopic polyarteritis), cutaneous leukocytoclastic vasculitis, Wegener's granulomatosis, giant-cell vasculitides, localized vasculitis, and angiocentric lymphomas (lymphomatous vasculitis).

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

N Weidner. 2001. Introduction. Vasculitis.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11296988/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

The road to consensus: considerations for the safe use and prescribing of COX-2-specific inhibitors.

We describe a process which aimed to achieve consensus on evidence-based considerations for the safe prescribing and use of the COX-2-specific inhibitors available in Australia among a group of 31 clinicians and other health professionals, drawn from practice, academia and industry. Difficulties were encountered at several points: the composition of the working group was contentious; the evidence, drawn from large clinical studies, was criticised by some for problems of study design, data analysis and reporting; interpretation of study results was influenced by the interpreter's knowledge, skills and biases; and the formulation of the "Considerations" became more controversial as summary statements were contracted and simplified. Agreement on the final draft was achieved among 23 of 31 participants. Evidence-based practice guidelines are a welcome development in modern medicine, but the consensus required to produce them can mask important diversity of opinion.

Consensus Statements as Topic↗