PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 11298101

Contact urticaria.

Abstract

Contact urticaria has been reported following skin contact with a multitude of substances ranging from simple chemicals to macromolecules. Its prevalence amongst the general population is unknown, but it may be a relatively common and under-recognized phenomenon. Non-immunological (irritant) causes typically elicit mild localized reactions, which clear within hours. Such agents can be found widely in food, cosmetics and medicaments. The lower diagnostic end-point for nonimmunological contact urticaria has been the subject of debate, which makes interpretation of the literature difficult. Immunological (allergic) contact urticaria is due to immediate-type hypersensitivity, and occurs most commonly in atopic individuals. It is mediated primarily by histamine, and may be associated with systemic, and potentially life-threatening symptoms. Natural rubber latex is one of the most important causes today, and the recent 'epidemic' of latex protein allergy has helped draw attention to this subject. Immunological contact urticaria to animal or vegetable matter may occasionally affect those who handle food, and other occupations such as agricultural and veterinary workers. This may be associated with development of a protein contact dermatitis. The diagnosis of immunological contact urticaria can often be confirmed by simple investigations such as skin prick testing or measurement of specific IgE.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

S H Wakelin. 2001. Contact urticaria.. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2230.2001.00780.x

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Dermatologist and family practitioner practice patterns for occupational contact dermatitis.

Medical practitioners have a role in the recognition of occupational contact dermatitis. The longer the duration of symptoms before diagnosis, the poorer the outcome. Our objective was to understand practice patterns, barriers and needs for early diagnosis of occupational contact dermatitis. A survey to obtain information on practice patterns was developed based on the literature and interviews with dermatologists and family practitioners. The survey was sent to all dermatologists and a random sample of 600 family practitioners in Ontario. Fifty-seven per cent of dermatologists and 9% of family practitioners report seeing more than 20 patients per year with occupational contact dermatitis. The majority of practitioners report taking a workplace exposure history. Barriers to taking a workplace exposure history include time constraints and lack of knowledge. Reasons for referral to specialists include a lack of expertise, testing facilities and knowledge about workers' compensation, time constraints and inadequate reimbursement, whereas lack of access to specialists is a barrier for referral. Although most practitioners identify a need for further education, a low volume of patients and time constraints are key barriers to continuing education. Opportunities are identified to improve educational initiatives and health services delivery for occupational contact dermatitis, tailored to each practitioner group.

Dermatitis, Allergic Contact↗