PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 11301774

Making mistakes in practice. Developing a consensus statement.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To develop a reference statement for the appropriate management of mistakes in the general practice training environment. METHOD: The setting was a series of focus groups held during workshops with The Royal Australian College of General Practitioners Training Program in the Northern Territory (NT). The participants included NT supervisors and registrars, and representatives of the Consumer Reference Group, Top End Division of General Practice. RESULTS: A reference statement and mutually agreed list of duties for registrars, their supervisors and patients. CONCLUSION: Mistakes are a part of the practice of medicine and can impact on everyone. An appropriate response and the opportunity to reflect and learn from the experience are important elements in minimising the adverse impact. We recommend that the issue of mistakes be considered a priority in the teaching of medicine.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

E M Kennedy, S R Heard. 2001. Making mistakes in practice. Developing a consensus statement.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11301774/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Holiday waistline. Time to consensus: the effect of the stomach on consensus decision-making at large conferences.

INTRODUCTION: The factors affecting decision-making at consensus conferences are not well understood. This paper studies the complex association between time to consensus (TTC) and the timing and quality of food, as well as the self-reported level of frustration (PITA factor) with the question at hand. METHODS: We came, we saw, we ate. RESULTS: There was an association between the TTC and the time to eating, especially lunch. There was a trend to faster TTC the better the researchers rated the food. The speed of decision-making was also increased when the PITA score was high, especially late in the day. INTERPRETATION: Organizers of large consensus conferences need to be aware of these factors in decision-making and should try to use them to get more controversial items voted to their satisfaction.

Consensus Statements as Topic↗