PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 11304739

Two-phase shelf-life estimation.

J Shao·S C Chow
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Unlike most drug products, some drug products must be stored at several temperatures, such as -20 degrees C, 5 degrees C and 25 degrees C, in order to maintain the stability of the drug products. Drug products of this kind are usually referred to as frozen drug products. The determination of shelf-life for frozen drug products involves the estimation of drug shelf-lives at different temperatures, which requires multiple phase linear regression. Mellon suggested obtaining a combined shelf-life by determining shelf-lives based on data available at different temperatures. This method, however, does not account for the fact that the shelf-life at the second-phase would depend on the shelf-life at the first phase. As an alternative, we propose a method for determination of drug shelf-lives for the two phases using a two-phase regression analysis based on the statistical principle described in the FDA guideline and the ICH guideline. A numerical example is presented to illustrate the proposed method.

Explore related subjects

Confidence IntervalsCryopreservationDrug StabilityDrug StorageGuidelines as TopicHumansRegression AnalysisTemperatureUnited StatesUnited States Food and Drug AdministrationJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J Shao, S C Chow. 2001-04-30. Two-phase shelf-life estimation.. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.783

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2001

Calculation of the uncertainty in complication probability for various dose-response models, applied to the parotid gland.

PURPOSE: Usually, models that predict normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) are fitted to clinical data with the maximum likelihood (ML) method. This method inevitably causes a loss of information contained in the data. In this study, an alternative method is investigated that calculates the parameter probability distribution (PD), and, thus, conserves all information. The PD method also allows the calculation of the uncertainty in the NTCP, which is an (often-neglected) prerequisite for the intercomparison of both treatment plans and NTCP models. The PD and ML methods are applied to parotid gland data, and the results are compared. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The drop in salivary flow due to radiotherapy was measured in 25 parotid glands of 15 patients. Together with the parotid gland dose-volume histograms (DVH), this enabled the calculation of the parameter PDs for three different NTCP models (Lyman, relative seriality, and critical volume). From these PDs, the NTCP and its uncertainty could be calculated for arbitrary parotid gland DVHs. ML parameters and resulting NTCP values were calculated also. RESULTS: All models fitted equally well. The parameter PDs turned out to have nonnormal shapes and long tails. The NTCP predictions of the ML and PD method usually differed considerably, depending on the NTCP model and the nature of irradiation. NTCP curves and ML parameters suggested a highly parallel organization of the parotid gland. CONCLUSIONS: Considering the substantial differences between the NTCP predictions of the ML and PD method, the use of the PD method is preferred, because this is the only method that takes all information contained in the clinical data into account. Furthermore, PD method gives a true measure of the uncertainty in the NTCP.

Confidence Intervals↗