PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 11322806

Meeting the challenge of problem-based learning: developing the facilitators.

Abstract

Problem-based learning methodologies are now extensively utilized within contemporary nursing curricula. One factor which has been found to be vital to the successful use of these methodologies is the effectiveness of the facilitator. For some teachers, the facilitation of problem-based learning tutorials demands a shift from teacher- to student-centred instruction; for others it requires continuing development of present practice. It is proposed that this transformation or modification of teacher practice can be achieved through the use of group reflection for teacher development. This paper suggests that a group reflective practice strategy for facilitator development is more likely to prepare teachers to meet the demands of problem-based learning than traditional forms of staff development. The strategy proffered for teacher development has two phases: phase one establishes the group and centres discussion on the practice of problem-based learning facilitation; phase two involves critical analysis of personal practice of facilitation in the context of problem-based learning with a view to increased self-knowledge, ultimately leading to a change in practice. Changes to personal practice will be sustained by repeated participation in phase two. Essential to this ongoing participation will be recognition and support from the host organization.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

A K Johnston, R S Tinning. 2001. Meeting the challenge of problem-based learning: developing the facilitators.. https://doi.org/10.1054/nedt.2000.0526

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Information-sharing among couples considering multifetal pregnancy reduction.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the information-sharing strategies of couples considering fetal reduction, and the impact of these strategies on the chances of encountering hostility in their social networks. DESIGN: Cross-sectional design of semistructured qualitative interviews, coded with respect to sharing strategies and level of personally directed hostility encountered. SETTING: Multiple Pregnancy Management Program, Comprehensive Genetics, New York, New York. PATIENT(S) AND INTERVENTION(S): Fifty women and their partners who were making a first visit to our maternal-fetal management facility, in order to consider the possibility of multifetal reduction as a pregnancy-management strategy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Development of information-sharing strategies, and the chances of encountering personally directed hostility regarding multifetal reduction associated with more and less selective strategies. RESULT(S): Four information-sharing strategies emerged from the analysis. Two of these strategies were relatively open (extended network, and both parents). Two other strategies were relatively selective (qualified family and friends, and defended relationship). The selective strategies were significantly less likely to encounter to encounter personally directed hostility (odds ratio, 3.88; 95% confidence intervals, 0.87-17.30). CONCLUSION(S): Selective sharing of information for couples considering multifetal prgnancy reduction is a potentially useful strategy for moderating potentially stressful relationships in their social networks. Clinics should find a way of integrating the discussion of selective sharing into their clinic's cultural repertoire of patient-support services.

Communication↗