PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 11324133

Demystifying medical complexities.

Abstract

Although dentists often fear treating medically complex patients, in many cases this fear may be based not on scientific facts but rather on a "mythology" of the dangers of dentistry. Dentistry is a remarkably safe profession, even for most medically complex patients. The myths of endocarditis, artificial joint infections, local anesthetics and vasoconstrictors, dental surgery in anticoagulated patients and patients on antiplatelet drugs, and antibiotic interference with oral contraceptives are discussed. Although dental treatment is not usually a risk factor for endocarditis, practitioners should consult the 1997 American Heart Association statement for recommendations for endocarditis prevention. Most artificial joint patients should not receive antibiotic prophylaxis. Local anesthetics and vasoconstrictors can be used safely in most medically complex patients. Neither continuous anticoagulation nor antiplatelet medications should be withdrawn for dental surgery. Scientific studies have failed to document an interaction between antibiotics used in dentistry and oral contraceptives.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

M J Wahl. 2000. Demystifying medical complexities.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11324133/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Perspectives.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Anesthesia, Dental↗

Strap him down or knock him out: Is conscious sedation with restraint an alternative to general anaesthesia?

When confronting a defiant or pre-co-operative young patient with extensive dental decay the dentist must decide between treatment under conscious sedation with passive restraint or general anaesthesia. Although some practitioners prefer to attempt and exhaust sedative techniques in most cases and use general anaesthesia as a last resort, many others do not mandate that alternate approaches first be attempted before treating under general anaesthesia and routinely recommend it as their first choice. What are the considerations involved in this decision-making process? Should the use of conscious sedation with restraint be revisited and perhaps even be considered the preferred method? What is the role of the dentist in the decision-making process? The purpose of this opinion-based paper is to present to the UK dentist a dilemma that paediatric dentists face in the US and in other countries as well and allow the reader to establish an opinion.

Anesthesia, Dental↗

A UK perspective.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Anesthesia, Dental↗