Upper extremity microsurgery.

W C Pederson

Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 11335829

Upper extremity microsurgery.

W C Pederson

View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

LEARNING OBJECTIVES: After studying this article, the participant should be able to: 1. Understand the indications for free flap coverage of the upper extremity. 2. Know the advantages and disadvantages of the flaps discussed. 3. Have a basic understanding of the anatomy of the flaps discussed. 4. Have a variety of options for free tissue transfer.The application of microsurgical tissue transfer to reconstruction of the upper extremity allows repair of significant bone and soft-tissue defects. Through the years the approach has changed from one of simply getting the wound covered to primary reconstruction to preserve or regain function. A wide variety of free flaps offers the potential to reconstruct nearly any defect of the arm and hand. Vascularized bone transfer can be utilized to repair large bony defects, while innervated free muscle transfer can replace missing muscle function. The total array of flaps and their indications is beyond the scope of a single discussion, but this article focuses on a few flaps that have found application for coverage and functional restoration in the hand and upper extremity.

Explore related subjects

Arm Injuries Bone Transplantation Fibula Humans Microsurgery Plastic Surgery Procedures Soft Tissue Injuries Surgical Flaps Thumb Toes Journal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

W C Pederson. 2001. Upper extremity microsurgery.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11335829/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2002

Traumatic injuries: imaging of peripheral musculoskeletal injuries.

The current dominant role of conventional radiography must be reassessed at increasingly shorter intervals in view of the continuing emergence of new imaging modalities that are available to diagnose peripheral musculoskeletal injuries. In comparison with conventional radiography, digital radiographic techniques offer advantages for optimization of image quality and dose, such as a wider dynamic range and post-processing of images. Currently, digital luminescence radiography (storage phosphor radiography) is the most commonly used digital method for obtaining radiographs, using the established positioning projections and routines of the film-screen technique. A new process, radiography with flat-panel amorphous silicon detectors, is still under development. Computed tomography is a valuable tool for diagnosing injuries of the peripheral musculoskeletal system, especially when three-dimensional data sets are acquired; these allow reformating images in all planes desired (2D technique) or in a volumetric format (3D technique). Established indications for CT in the peripheral skeleton are hip fractures, wrist injuries and calcaneal fractures; however, CT may be used as a supplement to radiography in every region of the body. Sonography is beginning to play an increasingly important role in trauma. Muscle and tendon injuries are the most common indications, but worthwhile information can be gained of the shoulder, elbow, hip, and knee joints, supplementing conventional or digital radiography. Magnetic resonance imaging effectively visualizes traumatic changes of the skeleton and the peripheral soft tissues. It is the method of choice to detect occult fractures. It can be used to diagnose muscle and tendon injuries. Joint injuries, especially in the knee and the shoulder joint, are common indications for MRI in the posttraumatic setting.

Arm Injuries↗

PubMed2002

Stress and work-related upper extremity disorders: implications for prevention and management.

BACKGROUND: A causal link between stress and work-related musculoskeletal disorders of the upper extremities (WRUEDs) has been established, but there is less evidence for a beneficial effect of stress reduction interventions on WRUED symptoms and incidence. METHODS: Searches of Medline, Ergonomics Abstracts, and Psychlit from 1990 to 2001 identified studies that either targeted stress and measured WRUED outcomes, or described other interventions with both stress and WRUED outcomes. RESULTS: Workplace interventions, including discrete improvements in technology, work organization and ergonomics, and more comprehensive approaches can reduce levels of stress. In a few studies, these interventions have been associated with decreases in WRUED symptoms. Similar effects are noted in stress-related interventions targeting individuals before WRUEDs have appeared, and at several stages of these conditions. CONCLUSIONS: Health care providers can recognize stress-WRUED interactions through careful, directed inquiry. Both individual as well as workplace-targeted interventions, delivered in the primary care setting or workplace, may be helpful. Future research priorities include prospective studies of well-defined interventions, with ample measures of subject, intervention and workplace characteristics that can impact outcomes, and adequate follow-up to determine sustained effects.

Arm Injuries↗

PubMed2002

Are psychosocial factors, risk factors for symptoms and signs of the shoulder, elbow, or hand/wrist?: A review of the epidemiological literature.

BACKGROUND: In 1993, an extensive review on the role of psychosocial factors in the development of musculoskeletal problems was published by Bongers et al (1993). Since then, additional reviews on this topic have been published; however, none of these focussed on upper limb problems. METHODS: In this systematic review, the methodological quality of all studies was assessed and levels of evidence were apriori defined. RESULTS: The large majority of the studies reported an association between at least one work-related psychosocial factor and adverse upper extremity symptoms or signs. High-perceived job stress was consistently associated with all upper extremity problems (UEP) in high and lower quality studies. Although not often studied, non-work-related stress was also consistently associated with UEP. In addition, there was some evidence for a relationship between high job demands and UEP, although the results did not meet the pre-set criterion for consistency. CONCLUSIONS: High job stress and non-work-related stress reactions are consistently associated with UEP. In addition, high job demands is also in most studies associated with these disorders. Firm conclusions on the role of these factors in the etiology of UEP are not possible due to the cross-sectional nature of most studies.

Arm Injuries↗