PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 11337736

Laparoscopic dissecting instruments.

A E Park·M J Mastrangelo·A Gandsas·U Chu·N E Quick
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The authors provide an overview of laparoscopic dissecting instruments and discuss early development, surgical options, and special features. End effectors of different shapes and functions are described. A comparison of available energy sources for laparoscopic instruments includes discussion of thermal dissection, ultrasonic dissection, and water-jet dissection. The ergonomic risks and challenges inherent in the use of current laparoscopic instruments are outlined, as well as ergonomic issues for the design of future instruments. New directions that laparoscopic instrumentation may take are considered in connection with developing technology in robotics, haptic feedback, and MicroElectroMechanical Systems.

Explore related subjects

DissectionEquipment DesignErgonomicsHumansLaparoscopyUltrasonicsJournal ArticleResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tReview

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

A E Park, M J Mastrangelo, A Gandsas, U Chu, N E Quick. 2001. Laparoscopic dissecting instruments.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11337736/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2002

Danger of damaging the medial branches of the posterior rami of spinal nerves during a dorsomedian approach to the spine.

Postoperative atrophy of the deep back muscles may be caused by denervation during a dorsomedian approach to the thoracolumbar spine; ensuing instability of the spine with poor clinical results, perhaps due to such muscle loss, has been observed in 11.7% of cases (Sihvonen et al., 1993, Spine 18:575--581). More specifically, this complication may be caused by damaging the medial branches of the posterior rami of the spinal nerves during lateral retraction of the muscles. To investigate the anatomic topography of the medial branches of the posterior rami of the spinal nerves, 18 carbol-formol-fixed specimens were dissected using an operation microscope; also, 3 fresh cadavers were cut in horizontal and vertical planes with a rotary cryotome to confirm the anatomic topography observed in the fixed specimens. In the thoracolumbar spine the medial branch of the posterior ramus of the spinal nerve is subject to ligamentous fixation by the strong fibers of the mammillo-accessory ligament, which extends between the mammillary process and accessory process infero lateral to the superior articular process. When the dorsomedian approach to the thoracolumbar spine is enlarged laterally to the articular processes by retracting the paraspinous muscles, the medial branches of the posterior rami of the spinal nerves are endangered. This may cause postoperative pain as well as dynamic instability beyond the corresponding segments. The results of our anatomic study suggest that the posterior surgical midline approach to the thoracolumbar spine should not be enlarged laterally to the articular processes to prevent injury to the medial branches of the posterior rami of the spinal nerves.

Dissection↗
PubMed2002

Unusual anatomic variation of palmar sensory branches of the ulnar nerve: a case report.

Variant sensory branches of the ulnar nerve were encountered during a routine dissection of the palmar aspects of a cadaver hand. The variant branches were distributed to the ulnar half of the index, ulnar half of the middle, and radial half of the ring fingers. The communicating branch between the superficial ulnar branch and the third common digital branch of the median nerve was absent. Distribution of the median nerve sensory branches was normal. The clinical significance of this variation is discussed.

Dissection↗
PubMed2002

Radiologic evaluation of the ulnar styloid.

The ulnar styloid (US) architecture was examined radiologically and directly by dissection in 13 cadaver wrists to examine a potential relationship between US shape and US abutment syndrome and to determine an optimal radiographic view that could be used to detect US fractures. A higher incidence of US abutment syndrome in the radially deviated US type was observed by dissection. Radiographs taken at varying shoulder abduction angles suggested that the base of the US and ulnar head are not round. To best evaluate the fovea and the US for possible US fractures, radiographs should be taken with the glenohumeral joint abducted 45 degrees, the elbow flexed 90 degrees, the forearm in neutral rotation, and the x-ray beam directed through the wrist perpendicular to the floor.

Dissection↗