PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 11355650

A program to teach curriculum development to junior faculty.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Even though curriculum skills are widely acknowledged to be an important part of faculty development in family medicine, reports of outcomes of programs that teach those skills are rarely found in the medical education literature. The Curriculum Workshop Series, one part of a 1-year faculty development fellowship for recent residency graduates, was designed to teach curriculum skills to junior faculty. THE PROGRAM: Developed as part of the Harbor-UCLA Family Medicine Faculty Development Fellowship, the Curriculum Workshop Series consisted of monthly or twice-monthly group sessions, readings, discussion, and individual projects with feedback from colleagues and the instructor. Objectives included developing an understanding of six fundamental steps of curriculum development, completion of an individual project, and giving and receiving feedback regarding projects. Outcome measures included number of projects implemented, the quality of projects, and participant satisfaction. OUTCOMES: Eight fellows participated in the Curriculum Workshop Series and completed projects. Six of eight were implemented, providing three new curricular opportunities and three enhancements to existing curricula for three family practice residency programs. Review of projects by outside experts showed that a majority of the six steps were addressed by most fellows but that more emphasis needed to be placed on the clarity of the written curriculum, the link between teaching strategies and specific learning objectives, and evaluation of learners and projects. Participants endorsed the relevance of curriculum skills, the practical step-by-step approach to curriculum development, and the opportunity to produce and implement an individual project. CONCLUSIONS: The Curriculum Workshop Series provides a straightforward format for teaching curriculum skills to junior faculty and demonstrates that recent graduates have the ability to make a contribution in the area of curriculum development. The format presented here could readily be adapted to other faculty development settings. Long-term outcomes of this type of faculty development remain to be studied.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

S Snyder. 2001. A program to teach curriculum development to junior faculty.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11355650/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Myco-Ed: Mycological curriculum for education and discovery.

Fungi are important and hyperdiverse organisms, yet chronically understudied. Most fungal clades have no reference genomes, impeding our understanding of their ecosystem functions and use as solutions in health and biotechnology. Also, opportunities for training in fungal biology and genomics are lacking, creating a bottleneck that hinders the recruitment and cultivation of a talented future mycological workforce. To address these issues, we developed Myco-Ed, an educational program offering training and scientific contributions through genome sequencing and analysis. Myco-Ed empowers students to pursue careers in fungal biology while improving fungal resources. Myco-Ed has been piloted at 12 institutions (15 classrooms) ranging from online e-Campuses to R1 universities, resulting in hundreds of fungal observations and many new high-quality reference genomes.

Curriculum↗

Educational programs in US medical schools, 2001-2002.

We used data mainly from the 2001-2002 Liaison Committee on Medical Education Annual Medical School Questionnaire, which had a 100% response rate, to describe the status of US medical education programs. In 2001-2002, the number of full-time medical school faculty members was 104 949, a 2.4% increase from 1999-2000. The 34,859 applicants for the class entering in 2001 represented a 9.5% decrease from the number of applicants in 1999-2000. There were 2 applicants for every acceptance, and the academic qualifications of medical students entering in 2001 were unchanged from 1999. Women comprised 47.8% of entering students in 2001, and 13.1% were members of underrepresented minority groups. Of all first-year students, 67% were in-state residents. Most medical schools had mandatory required night call during at least some required clinical clerkships, but only 17 had formal policies on medical student work hours. In 74 schools (60%), medical students were required to pass Steps 1 and 2 of the United States Medical Licensing Examination to advance or graduate.

Curriculum↗