PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 11359319

Anaesthesia for caesarean section.

M R Dresner·J M Freeman
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Quality and choice in anaesthesia for caesarean section have significantly improved over the last two decades. During this time, general anaesthesia usage has decreased to the point where, in some centres, it is an occasionally used technique for severe fetal distress. This change in practice may have been responsible for the fall in anaesthetic deaths in pregnant women that has occurred over the same period. The boom in regional anaesthesia has improved the aesthetics of childbirth by caesarean section, women's peri-operative comfort, and post-operative analgesia. It has, however, introduced new problems, such as delays in inducing anaesthesia in emergency situations, post-operative immobility and urinary retention. The increase in anaesthetic choices has led to inconsistencies in practice between individual anaesthetists, and between regions and nations. It is therefore impossible for obstetricians to make assumptions about the impact of anaesthesia on their patients. Where possible, anaesthetic protocols and guidelines should exist in every centre, with obstetricians clearly informed of relevant features. Such an approach will prevent inconsistent advice being given to patients and dangerous mistakes occurring. With every aspect of maternity care, a multidisciplinary team approach is in patients' best interests, and anaesthesia for caesarean section is no exception.

Explore related subjects

Anesthesia, EpiduralAnesthesia, GeneralAnesthesia, ObstetricalAnesthesia, SpinalAnesthetics, LocalCesarean SectionContraindicationsFemaleHumansIntubation, IntratrachealNarcoticsPneumonia, AspirationPregnancyJournal ArticleReview

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

M R Dresner, J M Freeman. 2001. Anaesthesia for caesarean section.. https://doi.org/10.1053/beog.2000.0153

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2007

Effects of epidural anaesthesia on surgical stress-induced immunosuppression during upper abdominal surgery.

BACKGROUND: Previously, we have demonstrated that surgical stress rapidly induced transient hyporesponsiveness of blood cells to endotoxin and that monocyte mCD14 and HLA-DR expression decreased soon after the start of surgery under general anaesthesia. This study was designed to investigate the effects of epidural anaesthesia on surgical stress-induced immunosuppression in patients undergoing upper abdominal surgery. METHODS: After having obtained informed consent, patients were randomly allocated to receive general anaesthesia (Group G) or general anaesthesia with epidural anaesthesia (Group E). Perioperative changes in neutrophil phagocytic activity, neutrophil respiratory burst activity, monocyte mCD14 and HLA-DR expression, plasma IL-10 concentration, and the LPS-induced TNF-alpha production in whole blood were measured. RESULTS: Surgical stress rapidly depressed neutrophil phagocytic activity, monocyte mCD14 and HLA-DR expression, and LPS-induced TNF-alpha production ex vivo (P < 0.05 vs preoperation) in both Group G and Group E. In contrast, the plasma IL-10 concentration increased significantly 2 h after the start of surgery (P < 0.05) in both groups. There were no significant differences between the two groups. The neutrophil respiratory burst activity did not change during the operation in either group. CONCLUSION: This study showed that the innate immune system is suppressed from the early period of upper abdominal surgery. Subgroup analysis suggested that epidural anaesthesia to T4 dermatome as well as general anaesthesia may not protect patients from this immunosuppression. These results in part explain the impairment of host-defense mechanisms seen in the perioperative period.

Anesthesia, Epidural↗
PubMed2007

Local anesthetics.

Local anesthetics are used broadly to prevent or reverse acute pain and treat symptoms of chronic pain. This chapter, on the analgesic aspects of local anesthetics, reviews their broad actions that affect many different molecular targets and disrupt their functions in pain processing. Application of local anesthetics to peripheral nerve primarily results in the blockade of propagating action potentials, through their inhibition of voltage-gated sodium channels. Such inhibition results from drug binding at a site in the channel's inner pore, accessible from the cytoplasmic opening. Binding of drug molecules to these channels depends on their conformation, with the drugs generally having a higher affinity for the open and inactivated channel states that are induced by membrane depolarization. As a result, the effective potency of these drugs for blocking impulses increases during high-frequency repetitive firing and also under slow depolarization, such as occurs at a region of nerve injury, which is often the locus for generation of abnormal, pain-related ectopic impulses. At distal and central terminals the inhibition of voltage-gated calcium channels by local anesthetics will suppress neurogenic inflammation and the release of neurotransmitters. Actions on receptors that contribute to nociceptive transduction, such as TRPV1 and the bradykinin B2 receptor, provide an independent mode of analgesia. In the spinal cord, where local anesthetics are present during epidural or intrathecal anesthesia, inhibition of inotropic receptors, such as those for glutamate, by local anesthetics further interferes with neuronal transmission. Activation of spinal cord mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinases, which are essential for the hyperalgesia following injury or incision and occur in both neurons and glia, is inhibited by spinal local anesthetics. Many G protein-coupled receptors are susceptible to local anesthetics, with particular sensitivity of those coupled via the Gq alpha-subunit. Local anesthetics are also infused intravenously to yield plasma concentrations far below those that block normal action potentials, yet that are frequently effective at reversing neuropathic pain. Thus, local anesthetics modify a variety of neuronal membrane channels and receptors, leading to what is probably a synergistic mixture of analgesic mechanisms to achieve effective clinical analgesia.

Anesthesia, Epidural↗