PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 11359646

Predictive approaches for choosing hyperparameters in gaussian processes.

Abstract

Gaussian processes are powerful regression models specified by parameterized mean and covariance functions. Standard approaches to choose these parameters (known by the name hyperparameters) are maximum likelihood and maximum a posteriori. In this article, we propose and investigate predictive approaches based on Geisser's predictive sample reuse (PSR) methodology and the related Stone's cross-validation (CV) methodology. More specifically, we derive results for Geisser's surrogate predictive probability (GPP), Geisser's predictive mean square error (GPE), and the standard CV error and make a comparative study. Within an approximation we arrive at the generalized cross-validation (GCV) and establish its relationship with the GPP and GPE approaches. These approaches are tested on a number of problems. Experimental results show that these approaches are strongly competitive with the existing approaches.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

S Sundararajan, S S Keerthi. 2001. Predictive approaches for choosing hyperparameters in gaussian processes.. https://doi.org/10.1162/08997660151134343

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

How to estimate moments and quantiles of environmental data sets with non-detected observations? A case study on volatile organic compounds in marine water samples.

Concentrations of 27 priority volatile organic compounds were measured in water samples of the North Sea and Scheldt estuary during a 3-year monitoring study. Despite the use of a sensitive analytical method, a number of data were censored. That is, some concentrations were below the decision limit or critical level defined by IUPAC. To characterize the observed measurement results, an attempt was made to identify an appropriate procedure to compute summary statistics for the censored data sets. Several parametric and robust parametric approaches based on the maximum likelihood principle and probability-plot regression method were evaluated for the estimation of the mean, standard deviation, median and interquartile range using three uncensored analytes (1,1,2-trichloroethane, tetrachloroethene and o-xylene) from the monitoring survey. Performance was assessed by artificially censoring the observed concentrations and estimating moments and quantiles at each censoring level. Results showed that methods with the least distributional assumptions, such as the robust bias-corrected restricted maximum likelihood method, perform best for estimating the mean and standard deviation, while both parametric and robust parametric techniques can be used for quantiles. Hence, summary statistics could be estimated with little bias (5-10%) up to 80% of censoring for the data sets employed in this study.

Likelihood Functions↗

Some statistical aspects of the maximum parsimony method.

The last three decades have seen considerable debate concerning the relative merits and problems associated with two competing approaches to phylogeny--approaches based on the parsimony principle versus maximum likelihood methodology. Although the two approaches may seem quite opposed, there are in fact some close relationships between them. For example, we describe a recent result that shows how maximum parsimony can be regarded as a type of maximum likelihood estimator when there is no common mechanism between sites (such as might occur with morphological data and certain forms of molecular data). Distinguishing between this and other implementations of maximum likelihood helps clarify some of the dispute that has surrounded the two methodologies. We also provide a brief overview of some mathematical and statistical properties of the maximum parsimony criterion.

Likelihood Functions↗