PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 11360324

Technical considerations.

Abstract

Appropriately applied, guided tissue regeneration (GTR) therapy is an important addition to the clinician's treatment armamentarium. However, GTR therapy is highly technique-sensitive, and failure to understand and manage the subtleties of treatment will significantly diminish therapeutic results. This article discusses the technical prerequisites for successful application of GTR therapy to infrabony defects and periodontally involved furcations for maximization of treatment results.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

P A Fugazzotto. 1999. Technical considerations.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11360324/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Microengineering neocartilage scaffolds.

Advances in micropatterning methodologies have made it possible to create structures with precise architecture on the surface of cell culture substrata. We applied these techniques to fabricate microfeatures (15-65 microm wide; 40 microm deep) on the surface of a flexible, biocompatible polysaccharide gel. The micropatterned polymer gels were subsequently applied as scaffolds for chondrocyte culture and proved effective in maintaining key aspects of the chondrogenic phenotype. These were rounded cell morphology and a positive and statistically significant (p < 0.0001) immunofluorescence assay for the production of type II collagen throughout the maximum culture time of 10 days after cell seeding. Further, cells housed within individual surface features were observed to proliferate, while serial application of chondrocytes resulted in the formation of cellular aggregates. These methods represent a novel approach to the problem of engineering reparative cartilage in vitro.

Absorbable Implants↗

Biodegradation of carbonate apatite/collagen composite membrane and its controlled release of carbonate apatite.

The aim of this study was to investigate the biodegradation of carbonate apatite (CO(3)Ap)/collagen composite membrane as a new guided tissue regeneration membrane in vivo and to estimate its controlled release of CO(3)Ap in vitro. To control the biodegradation of the guided tissue regeneration membrane and to promote hard tissue regeneration in the periodontal region, we added CO(3)Ap into the collagen membrane. To investigate the biodegradation of CO(3)Ap/collagen composite membranes, the prepared membranes (CO(3)Ap:0, 10 wt %) were cut into 5 x 5 x 0.1 mm and subcutaneously implanted into the backside of male rats under general anesthesia. The explanted membranes were investigated histologically. To estimate their controlled release of CO(3)Ap in vitro, the membranes (CO(3)Ap 0-10 wt %, 5 x 5 x 0.1 mm) were immersed into collagenase solution and compulsorily dissolved for 48 h. Histological results suggested that the membrane had a good biocompatibility and the biodegradable period was shortened with the presence of CO(3)Ap. In the solubility experiments of the membrane, eluted Ca concentrations gradually increased with total dependence on the dissolution of the collagen membrane. Our study demonstrated that the biodegradation time can be controlled by CO(3)Ap contents in the membrane and CO(3)Ap could be released from the membrane with the biodegradation period.

Absorbable Implants↗

Calvarial bone distraction with a contractile bioresorbable polymer.

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the possibility of mobilizing calvarial bone with a fully implantable and bioresorbable device. The animal model used was the New Zealand white rabbit (n = 12). An island bone flap attached to the dura mater was created in the parietal region and amalgam markers were placed in this bone flap and in the ipsilateral frontal bone. In one group of six rabbits (group 1), a specially processed contractile 70L/30D,L polylactic acid plate, 15 x 6 x 0.6 mm, was attached to the island flap by one extremity, and to the fixed ipsilateral frontal bone by the other. In group 2 (control), no plate was added. Bone marker movement was followed with serial radiography. In group 1, there was a progressive reduction in mean marker distance over the first 48 hours, and stability thereafter. In group 2 (control), mean marker distance remained stable until the second postoperative week, after which time there was a slight increase until the end of the experimental period. At 4 weeks, the mean marker separation differed significantly between group 1 (mean, -3.62 mm; SD, 0.79 mm) and group 2 (mean, 0.34 mm; SD, 0.14 mm; p <0.001). In conclusion, a totally implantable and bioresorbable device was successfully used to mobilize calvarial bone. Polymer contractility will likely constitute the basis of a new generation of bioresorbable distractors for use in craniofacial surgery.

Absorbable Implants↗