PubMed · 11364013
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
1996. Nerve growth factor study opens.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11364013/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
BACKGROUND: Estimating the time since HIV infection (TSI) at population level is essential for tracking changes in the global HIV epidemic. Most methods for determining TSI give a binary classification of infections as recent or non-recent within a window of several months, and cannot assess the cumulative impact of an intervention. RESULTS: We developed a Random Forest Regression model, HIV-phyloTSI, which combines measures of within-host diversity and divergence to generate continuous TSI estimates directly from viral deep-sequencing data, with no need for additional variables. HIV-phyloTSI provides a continuous measure of TSI up to 9 years, with a mean absolute error of less than 12 months overall and less than 5 months for infections with a TSI of up to a year. It performs equally well for all major HIV subtypes based on data from African and European cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrate how HIV-phyloTSI can be used for incidence estimates on a population level.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
This study examines the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic interactions between (1) lopinavir-ritonavir (L/R), a fixed combination of protease inhibitors used for the treatment of HIV disease, and (2) ritonavir alone at the same dosage as that in the L/R formulation, with methadone, an opiate frequently used in substance abuse pharmacotherapy for opioid (heroin)-dependent injection drug users, many of whom are infected with HIV. L/R was associated with significant reductions in the methadone area under the concentration-time curve (P<.001), maximum concentration (P<.001), and minimum concentration (P<.001), as well as increased methadone oral clearance (P<.001) and increased opiate withdrawal symptoms (P=.013), whereas ritonavir use alone modestly and nonsignificantly increased methadone concentrations. Lopinavir is a potent inducer of methadone metabolism, and treatment with L/R requires clinical monitoring and increased methadone doses in some patients, whereas ritonavir has no significant effect on methadone metabolism.