PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 11373523

Small bowel transplantation.

Abstract

Small bowel transplantation has become the treatment of choice for patients with chronic gut failure whose illness cannot be maintained on home parenteral nutrition. Outcomes have improved as a result of refinements in patient selection, surgical techniques, and the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of graft rejection. Early listing is important because of the shortage of organ donors. Rejection rates are still 50% or more, despite the use of potent immune suppression. Sepsis rates are also higher for patients who have had small bowel transplantation than for those who have received other organs because of bacterial translocation from the gut secondary to preservation injury and graft rejection. Graft and patient survival rates after small bowel transplantation are comparable to rates after lung transplantation. Successful transplant recipients resume unrestricted oral diets.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

A Ghanekar, D Grant. 2001. Small bowel transplantation.. https://doi.org/10.1097/00075198-200104000-00013

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Iron regulation.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Chronic Disease↗

The long-term effect of multidisciplinary back training: a systematic review.

STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review of randomized controlled trials. OBJECTIVES: To determine the long-term effect of multidisciplinary back training on the work participation of patients with nonspecific chronic low back pain. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Chronic low back pain is influenced by multiple factors. Multidisciplinary back training represents one of the options to take this multiplicity into account. So far, only evidence of the short-term effectiveness of this approach in terms of work participation is available. METHODS: Electronic databases were searched and the references of various articles were screened for relevant publications. Ten studies met the inclusion criteria. All included studies were evaluated for their methodologic quality. RESULTS: Five of the studies had a low methodologic quality. All high-quality studies found a positive effect on at least one of the 4 outcome measures used. Based on our criteria, effectiveness was found for the outcome measures of work participation and quality of life. No effectiveness was found for experienced pain and functional status. The intensity of the intervention seems to have no substantial influence on the effectiveness of the intervention. CONCLUSION: In the long-term, multidisciplinary back training has a positive effect on work participation in patients with nonspecific chronic low back pain.

Chronic Disease↗