PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 11376524

Quality in anesthesia.

Abstract

Quality of recovery after anesthesia and surgery is an important dimension of the patient's experience and may be related to the quality of anesthesia care. Quality of recovery is also related to patient satisfaction. We have developed and validated a quality of recovery (QoR) score. Adult patients undergoing elective and emergency surgery in a university teaching hospital are interviewed after surgery in order to identify adverse events, rate their level of pain and satisfaction, and measure their QoR Score. We have collected data on more than 10,000 patients. Patients recovering from day surgery have higher QoR Scores than those recovering from minor surgery, and both have higher scores than those recovering from major surgery. Patients with pre-existing illness or those who develop postoperative complications have lower QoR Scores. Patient satisfaction is associated with higher QoR Scores. The measurement of quality of recovery is an important aspect of a quality anaesthetic practice. The QoR Score can be incorporated into routine practice and this should improve patient care and resultant levels of satisfaction.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

P S Myles. 2001. Quality in anesthesia.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11376524/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

The role of gait analysis in the orthopaedic management of ambulatory cerebral palsy.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The literature was reviewed to describe the role of gait analysis in the orthopaedic management of ambulatory children with cerebral palsy and examine the current best evidence to support these roles. RECENT FINDINGS: Gait laboratory analysis is superior to visual or observational analysis of gait because it provides an objective record of gait that is able to quantify the magnitude of deviations of pathologic gait from normal and also explain these abnormalities. Recognizable gait patterns can be classified and used for making treatment decisions, the effectiveness of which can be assessed using gait analysis as a measure of gait outcomes. There are many sources of variability, however, including patients themselves, the gait laboratories and testing processes, interpretation of data and surgeons' surgical recommendations. SUMMARY: Although gait analysis has been shown to alter decision making, there is little evidence that the decisions based on gait analysis lead to better outcomes. Consequently, clinical gait analysis remains controversial, with wide variation in the rates of utilization of gait analysis in the management of children with ambulatory cerebral palsy. The time is ripe for clinical trials and cohort studies to provide the evidence to establish the appropriate utilization of this technology.

Ambulatory Surgical Procedures↗