PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 11400320

[Does 'selective binding profile' result in 'selective treatment'?].

Abstract

It has been believed that the 'selective binding profile' may result in the 'selective treatment' for a disease. However, typical antipsychotics with the selective affinity for dopamine D2 receptor produce antipsychotic efficacy against positive symptoms accompanied with extrapyramidal side effects. Serotonin-dopamine-antagonists produce fewer EPS, since they have a potent antagonistic activity for 5-HT2A receptor besides the dopamine D2 antagonism. The disinhibition of diminished glutamatergic transmission and alpha 1 antagonism by MARTAs (Multi-Acting-Acting-Receptor-Targeted-Antipsychotics) can reduce positive symptoms of schizophrenic patients, and the 5-HT2A antagonitic and anticholinergic activities of the drugs may reduce the EPS. Moreover, MARTAs increase intracellular concentrations of dopamine and norepinephrine in the prefrontal cortex and disinhibit the diminished glutamatergic transmission, which are expected to improve the negative symptoms, anxiety and depressive symptoms, and cognitive impairment that are difficult to be treated by other existing antipsychotics. These important biological changes are induced by the antagonism of 5-HT2A, 5-HT2C, alpha 1-adrenergic and muscarinic receptors by MARTAs. Thus a multireceptorial profile of MARTA is considered to result in the improved treatment. Therefore 'selective binding profile' does not always mean 'selective treatment.' Instead, if a breakthrough drug is to be developed for the treatment of refractory diseases, it may be necessary to rethink the ordinary strategy targeting for a single receptor.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

T Suzuki. 2001. [Does 'selective binding profile' result in 'selective treatment'?].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11400320/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Differential pharmacology of atypical antipsychotics: clinical implications.

PURPOSE: Pharmacology of atypical antipsychotics and the clinical implications are reviewed. SUMMARY: Psychiatric disorders, such as schizophrenia and bipolar disorder, are often associated with poor outcomes. Atypical antipsychotics have become the standard of care for these disorders, and multiple agents have demonstrated efficacy for both acute and maintenance therapy. As a result of their differential pharmacologic properties, atypical antipsychotics have diverse clinical profiles, resulting in different liabilities for specific adverse events. These effects can, in turn, have an adverse impact on patient functionality, adherence to therapy, and overall health. CONCLUSION: Atypical antipsychotics have distinct pharmacological profiles which result in clinically meaningful differences in adverse effects. Clinicians should have a wide choice of agents available with which to optimize outcomes in the majority of patients with psychiatric disorders.

Antipsychotic Agents↗