PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 11413662

Problems reported by elderly patients with multiple sclerosis.

Abstract

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is one of the most common organic neurological diseases of the central nervous system. Because of improved therapies, nurses are confronted with elderly MS patients, but little is known about the specific problems of these patients. This survey analyzed problems in elderly MS patients. Fifty-three MS patients (44 female, 9 male; average age 73 years, average course of MS 25.3 years) from the Berlin Section of the German Multiple Sclerosis Association were evaluated by using a standardized questionnaire, considering social situation, daily problems, disease course, and disabilities, and by using the expanded disability status scale (EDSS). Elderly MS patients reported impaired mobility and inability to use public transportation; about 96% presented EDSS scores above 6.0. Nearly 50% complained about spasticity and pain due to spasticity. More than 70% suffered from bladder dysfunction. Problems with sleep and fatigue were present in less than 20%, but interrupted sleep was common. Selfcare impairments were reported by 50%-75% of the patients, and most of them required professional help. Depressive moods and thoughts about committing suicide were mentioned by more than 30% of the patients. Elderly MS patients experience physical and psychosocial impairments. Healthcare professionals should consider increasing independence and avoiding nursing home admissions in the management of elderly MS patients.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J Klewer, D Pöhlau, I Nippert, J Haas, J Kugler. 2001. Problems reported by elderly patients with multiple sclerosis.. https://doi.org/10.1097/01376517-200106000-00009

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Halovest dynamic loads: full crossover comparison of three vest types.

STUDY DESIGN: Ten cervical spine trauma subjects were studied during halovest treatment. Each subject wore each of three different vests. OBJECTIVES: To compare the effect of vest design on loads between halo and vest during various activities. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Complications during halovest use may be related to vest design, a variety of which are available. Loads between halo and vest have been shown to vary with activity type, but no comparison between vest types has been reported previously. METHODS: Loads between the halo and the vest were measured during performance of activities of daily living and during load application to the halo, using custom-built four-channel transducers and a PC-based data acquisition system. RESULTS: Substantial variations between subjects exist in loads between the halo and the vest. At rest, neck distraction loads were significantly greater for the supine posture than for either the sitting or standing postures. Loads applied to the halo by the investigators are carried by the neck and not by the structure connecting the halo to the vest. During activities of daily living all four measured load components are generally nonzero. During activities of daily living substantial differences in loads occurred between vest types. For all activities of daily living combined, the relative neck distraction load values were as follows: 4PAD 100%, Bremer 159%, and PMT 180%. CONCLUSIONS: Previous evidence supports a connection between certain complications of halovest wear (such as pin loosening) and loads on the pins. This study shows that different halovests are associated with quite different loads between the vest and the halo (and thus loads on the pins and the neck). This is encouraging for prospective, clinical comparison of different halovests and for improvements in clinical performance through halovest design improvements.

Activities of Daily Living↗

Comprehensive assessment of the elderly cancer patient: the feasibility of self-report methodology.

PURPOSE: Comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) has aided the medical community greatly in understanding the quality-of-life issues and functional needs of older patients. With its professional team assessment approach, however, CGA may be time consuming and costly. The goal of the present study was to assess the ability of cancer patients to complete a self-administered CGA and then to characterize cancer patients across multiple domains and age groups. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two hundred sixty-six male outpatient oncology patients at the Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center were asked to fill out a survey assessing 10 domains (demographics, comorbid conditions, activities of daily living, functional status, pain, financial well being, social support, emotional state, spiritual well-being, and quality of life). RESULTS: Seventy-six percent of the patients who received their surveys and kept their appointments returned the assessment tool. Older oncology patients had significantly less education (P <.0001), income (P =.05), frequent exercise (P =.01), and chance of being disease free (P =.003) than younger patients. Other findings in older patients were a higher rate of marriage (P =.02), more difficulty in taking medications (P =.05), and less cigarette (P =.03) and alcohol (P =.03) use. Members of all age cohorts reported a sense of social support, with younger patients deriving this more from family and friends than older patients, and older patients deriving social support more from membership in religious communities than younger patients. No differences were found across age groups for number and impact of comorbid illnesses, number of medications, basic and instrumental activities of daily living, pain, overall health rating, financial adequacy, anxiety, depression, and quality of life. CONCLUSION: CGA can be conducted in an outpatient cancer community using a self-report format. Despite the fact that this population varied demographically across age groups and is limited to veterans, this study demonstrated remarkable similarities between younger and older cancer patients in terms of functional status, health states, and quality of life.

Activities of Daily Living↗

Comparison of instruments addressing quality of life in patients with ALS and their caregivers.

Most quality of life (QoL) instruments for ALS focus on function. An open instrument, the Schedule for the Evaluation of Individual Quality of Life-Direct Weight (SEIQoL-DW) that asks subjects to nominate and rate QoL areas important at the time of evaluation, was given to patients and caregiver spouses. Patients also completed function-based instruments. Correlations were poor between SEIQoL-DW and function-based instruments. SEIQoL-DW scores were worse for caregivers than for patients, probably explained by shifts in patient expectations with disease progression.

Activities of Daily Living↗