PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 11418239

Monitoring of the subtraction process in solid-phase representational difference analysis: characterization of a candidate drug.

Abstract

In this study, we have applied and evaluated a modified cDNA representational difference analysis (RDA) protocol based on magnetic bead technology to study the molecular effects of a candidate drug (N,N'-diacetyl-L-cystine, DiNAC) in a model for atherosclerosis. Alterations in a gene expression profile induced by DiNAC were investigated in a human monocytic cell line (THP-1) differentiated into macrophage-like cells by lipopolysaccharide and further exposed to DiNAC. Three rounds of subtraction have been performed and the difference products from the second and third rounds have been characterized in detail by analysis of over 1000 gene sequences. Two protocols for analysis of the subtraction products have been evaluated, a shotgun approach and size selection of both distinct fragments and band-patterned smear. We demonstrate that in order to obtain a representative view of the most abundant gene fragments, the shotgun procedure is preferred. The obtained sequences were analyzed against the UniGene and Expressed Gene Anatomy Database (EGAD) databases and the results were visualized and analyzed with the ExProView software enabling rapid pair-wise comparison and identification of individual genes or functional groups of genes with altered expression levels. The identified differentially expressed gene sequences were comprised of both genes with known involvement in atherosclerosis or cholesterol biosynthesis and genes previously not implicated in these processes. The applicability of a solid-phase shotgun RDA protocol, combined with virtual chip monitoring, results in new starting points for characterization of novel candidate drugs.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

S Boräng, T Andersson, A Thelin, M Larsson, J Odeberg, J Lundeberg. 2001-06-27. Monitoring of the subtraction process in solid-phase representational difference analysis: characterization of a candidate drug.. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0378-1119(01)00486-3

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

[Revascularization of atherosclerotic stenosis of the renal artery. Indications and results].

RISKS: Atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis typically occurs in high risk patients with coexistent vascular disease elsewhere. Patients with atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis may develop progressive renal failure but have a much higher risk of dying with a stroke or a myocardial infarction than of progressing to end-stage renal disease. REVASCULARIZATION RESULTS: Recent controlled trials comparing medication to revascularization have shown that only a minority of such patients can expect hypertension cure, whereas trials designed to document the ability of revascularization to prevent progressive renal failure are not yet available. Percutaneous renal artery angioplasty is the first choice because it is simpler than and as effective as surgical reconstruction. INDICATIONS: Revascularization should be undertaken in patients with atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis and resistant hypertension or heart failure, and probably in those with rapidly deteriorating renal function or with an increase in plasma creatinine levels during angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition. Older age, long history of hypertension and a kidney size less than 8 cm are associated with little chance of blood pressure improvement or kidney function recovery. PRACTICAL ATTITUDE: With or without revascularization, medical therapy using antihypertensive agents, statins and aspirin is necessary in almost all cases. Blood pressure and plasma creatinine concentration should be measured every three months. Kidney size and renal artery patency should be assessed yearly.

Arteriosclerosis↗