PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 11428875

MRSA in the critically ill.

Abstract

MRSA colonization and infection rates were prospectively examined over an 18 month period in a general Intensive Care Unit. Of 642 admissions, 305 were in ICU for longer than 48 h and were hence included and a further three patients were already colonized at admission but stayed less than 48 h. Ninety-seven patients were colonized with MRSA including 19 who were already colonized at admission. There were 56 episodes of clinical infection in 43 patients. The mortality rates in the colonized and infected groups, were 14.8% and 16.2% respectively, while the rate in those not colonized was 23%. These figures were not statistically different. Those colonized or infected with MRSA had significantly longer ICU stays than those not colonized. Sputum colonization and infection was a major site for MRSA. There was diagnostic certainty of MRSA infection in 40% of cases emphasizing the difficulty in diagnosis of infection due to MRSA in the critically ill. Both colonization and infection with MRSA are associated with longer ICU stay but do not appear to influence mortality.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

C Theaker, S Ormond-Walshe, B Azadian, N Soni. 2001. MRSA in the critically ill.. https://doi.org/10.1053/jhin.2001.0960

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Impact of simple interventions on neonatal mortality in a low-resource teaching hospital in India.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate impact of simple interventions on neonatal mortality in a low-resource teaching hospital in India. STUDY DESIGN: Before-and-after intervention trial setting: limited resource teaching hospital; DESIGN: Before and after study. INTERVENTIONS: A package of simple interventions was evolved. The interventions included: rational admissions and early discharge, entrusting mothers in care-giving, enforcing asepsis routines, aggressive enteral feeding, abandoning unnecessary interventions, protocol-based management, rational antibiotics and training and empowerment of nurses. STATISTICAL METHODS: The categorical and continuous variables were compared with chi (2) and two-tailed tests, respectively. RESULTS: Neonatal mortality rate declined significantly during the intervention period as compared to control period (20.3 versus 29.3 per 1000 live births; relative risk 0.69, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.57 to 0.85). Most significant decline occurred in sepsis-related deaths. The survival of neonates with birth weight 1000 to 1499 improved over two folds (56.7% versus 24.5%, P<0.01). There was a significant decline in antibiotics use (635/878, 72.3% versus 299/897, 23.2%; P=0.00). The duration of stay in neonatal unit was decreased by a mean of 1.5 day (95% CI 0.9 to 2.8 days) after interventions. CONCLUSIONS: Simple interventions can result in a significant decline in neonatal mortality in hospitals with limited resources. This package is likely to be effective in hospitals with a high proportion of the sepsis deaths.

Hospital Mortality↗