PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 11446000

Proteins, nucleic acids and genetic codes.

Abstract

On the basis of the previous article (Morchio and Traverso [1999]), we discuss the possible interactions between the first proteic fragments developed in the hydrophobic layer made of hydrocarbons, which would have covered the surface of the primitive seas, and the nitrogenous bases, particularly the pyrimidinic ones, which would have found in such hydrophobic layer favourable conditions to their prebiotic synthesis. These interactions would have presumably brought, on the basis of the physicochemical laws, at the moment the only ones at work, to the linkage of various bases and so to the construction of the first nucleic acid chains (most likely RNA). Interestingly enough this result would have been obtained by inserting two more bases between those hydrogen bound to the amino acids and this might have been the ground for the future "triplets". These interactions might have been particularly significant because of two important consequences: the birth of a rough genetic code and the starting of interactions of the co-operative type between bases and amino acids that would have made the growth of both proteic and nucleic acid fragments easier and faster. We conclude that the development of the genetic code was neither a "frozen accident" nor an occurrence directed by any information flow.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

R Morchio, A Redaelli, S Traverso. Proteins, nucleic acids and genetic codes.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11446000/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Alternative genetic codes in bacteria and archaea identified with a fast k-mer-based algorithm.

The genetic code is conserved across all domains of life and is often described as universal. Nevertheless, many exceptions to the "universal" code have now been documented, most of these through manual or semiautomated inspection of highly conserved genes. Modern bioinformatics tools improved our ability to find alternative genetic codes but remain computationally expensive, preventing widespread use on thousands of new species identified by sequencing environmental samples. Here, I report a >100-fold accelerated method for inferring the genetic code directly from assembled genomes and apply it to thousands of previously uncharacterized assemblies from archaea and bacteria. I describe three candidate genetic code variations, one of which, an alternative genetic code used by a family of Asgard archaea, is a unique example of sense codon reassignments for this domain. Identifying genetic code variations is important for understanding evolution of the standard code and improving accuracy of protein databases and open reading frame identification.

Genetic Code↗

The genetic code at the balance point of error and demand.

The origin and organizing principles of the genetic code remain central problems in molecular evolution. The low probability of the natural codon-to-amino acid mapping arising by chance has spurred the hypothesis that its structure is optimized for robustness to mutations and translational errors. For the construction of effective molecular machines, the repertoire of encoded amino acids must also be diverse enough in physicochemical features. Here, we examine whether the standard genetic code can be understood as a near-optimal solution balancing these two objectives: minimizing error load and aligning codon assignments with the naturally occurring amino acid composition. Using simulated annealing, we explore this trade-off across a broad range of parameters. We find that the standard genetic code resides near an optimum in the fitness landscape of possible genetic codes. The degeneracy of the code plays a dual role, minimizing mistranslation errors while matching codon multiplicity to amino acid usage frequencies. As a result, uniform codon usage alone is sufficient to recover the empirical amino acid composition, without any additional bias. It is a highly effective solution that balances fidelity against resource availability constraints. A comparative analysis of natural variants also reveals a functional decoupling: error robustness acts as a rigid global constraint determined by code topology, whereas compositional alignment serves as a more flexible variable that adapts to lineage-specific demands. These results support a multi-objective optimization framework in which the genetic code reflects a balance between translational fidelity and proteomic demand.

Genetic Code↗

Reading another hidden message in the genetic code.

The genetic code determines not only the amino acid sequences of proteins but also mRNA stability. How is this hidden message read? Hia and colleagues have now identified human DHX29 as a reader of the mRNA stability code carried by codons, providing new mechanistic insights into translation-coupled gene regulation.

Genetic Code↗