PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 11447867

External biphasic defibrillators. Should you catch the wave?

Abstract

Introduced about five years ago, external biphasic defibrillators have attracted a lot of attention. The biphasic waveforms they use have been shown in some studies to be more successful than standard monophasic waveforms in terminating ventricular fibrillation and ventricular tachycardia. But with this apparent step forward comes confusion: A variety of biphasic waveforms are available, and each defibrillator supplier is making claims for the superiority of its particular waveform. Are biphasic waveforms really better than monophasic? Is any one biphasic waveform preferable to another? What does the clinical literature say about this technology? This article answers those and other pressing questions about biphasic defibrillators.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

2001. External biphasic defibrillators. Should you catch the wave?. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11447867/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

A biventricular ICD system with biventricular defibrillation.

We describe the case of a 59-year-old gentleman with severe dilated cardiomyopathy requiring implantation of a dual-chamber biventricular implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD). High defibrillation thresholds (DFT) were encountered at implant with an inadequate defibrillation safety margin. Testing of all possible shock vectors/polarities with and without the SVC coil and optimization of the distal RV coil position all proved inadequate. A satisfactory defibrillation safety margin was achieved following placement of a second lead in the coronary sinus to enable biventricular defibrillation. This case highlights an additional strategy for combating high DFTs and is an option even in dual-chamber biventricular ICD systems.

Electric Countershock↗