PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 11452545

[Rheumatoid factor].

Abstract

To know the present situation of rheumatoid factor(RF) measurements, the questionnaire was sent to 82 University or College hospitals in Japan and regional 133 hospitals in Fukushima prefecture. Evaluation of qualitative RF kits commercially purchased in Japan was also performed. In RF measurement, quantitative methods have been increasingly used compared with semiquantitative or qualitative methods. Among quantitative RF measurement methods, latex immunoassay including latex-turbidimetry and latex-nephelometry is most frequently used. The reference values of RF distributed widely ranging from 5 to 40 unit. The 1997 JMA survey still showed interlaboratory differences in quantitative RF measurement. Qualitative RF kits were also shown to have variety of reactivities. To promote the improvement of current situation in RF measurement, "arbitrary" reference materials should be established urgently.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Y Imafuku, H Yoshida. 2001. [Rheumatoid factor].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11452545/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Technical evaluation of the potential for streamlining of equipment validation for fermentation applications.

The purpose of this article is to provide a few concrete examples of the potential to acceptably reduce the scope of validation and qualification testing based on scientific justification for the specific area of microbial fermentation. The key areas explored include: autoclave operational qualification (OQ) testing, autoclave load pattern testing, vessel sterilize-in-place testing, spore strip use and failure investigation, grouping of D-values for media and concentrated nutrients, influence of temperature on D-values, and equipment clean-in-place cleaning agent/recovery studies. Suggestions are offered based on technical data and engineering analysis of the procedures involved. Methodologies are described for how to evaluate the systems being tested relative to processing requirements to determine which testing might be minimized and which testing might warrant expansion. The ultimate risk to quality then must be evaluated by the designated quality control groups within the organization for the specific process and equipment in use.

Evaluation Studies as Topic↗