PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 11452581

Implementing a data warehouse at Inglis Innovative Services.

Abstract

Data warehouses, data marts, and data mining have been hot topics in the 1990s, offering the promise of a vault of corporate data ripe for decision making. As is true with all promising technologies, the key issue is how to get started. Implementation of a corporate data warehouse involves a lot more than spending a huge amount of money on hardware, software, and consultants. Successful implementation of a data warehouse involves a corporate treasure hunt--identifying and cataloging data. It involves data ownership, data integrity, and business process analysis to determine what the data are, who owns them, how reliable they are, and how they are processed. Finally, implementation of the warehouse drives the issue of how good the decisions are that are based on the information in the warehouse. This article presents a case study of how one healthcare facility dealt with the challenges of implementing a data warehouse.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

C Breen, L M Rodrigues. 2001. Implementing a data warehouse at Inglis Innovative Services.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11452581/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Prodding tardy reviewers: a randomized comparison of telephone, fax, and e-mail.

CONTEXT: To compare telephone, fax, and e-mail methods of prodding tardy reviewers. METHODS: Randomized trial conducted January 1998 through June 1999 at the main editorial office of Obstetrics & Gynecology. Reviewers who had failed to file reviews by 28 days after being sent manuscripts (7 days after deadline) were sent identical messages in oral (telephone) or written (fax and e-mail) form inquiring as to the status of review, asking for its completion as soon as possible, and requesting it be sent by fax or e-mail. RESULTS: Of 378 reviewers, proportions returning reviews within 7 days were essentially identical: telephone, 85 (68%) of 125; fax, 86 (67%) of 129; and e-mail, 84 (67%) of 124 (P =.59). In the two thirds who responded, the mean time to return reviews did not differ among the 3 groups. CONCLUSION: Contacting tardy reviewers resulted in a review being received within 7 days in about two thirds of cases, and it made no difference if the contact was made by telephone, fax, or e-mail.

Computer Communication Networks↗