PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 11498327

A method for estimating light interception by a conifer shoot.

Abstract

We present an operational method for estimating the amount of PAR intercepted by a coniferous shoot. Interception of PAR by a shoot is divided into three components: the amount of radiation coming from the sky, the transmission of radiation through the surrounding vegetation, and the shoot' s silhouette area facing the direction of the incoming radiation. All three components usually vary with direction. Radiation incident from the sky consists of direct and diffuse radiation. The well-known equation of motion for the sun and Beer' s Law for atmospheric transmittance are used to simulate the directional distribution of direct sunlight for any given period of time. The diffuse component is assumed to be uniform. Meteorological field measurements are used to calibrate the absolute amounts of the direct and diffuse components. The gap fraction (proportion of visible sky) in different directions around a shoot is measured by analyzing a hemispherical fish-eye photograph, taken at the location of the shoot, with an image processing program. Similarly, the shoot silhouette area (SSA) is measured by photographing the shoot from many different directions. The measurements of SSA are interpolated by a method called trigonometric interpolation to obtain the directional distribution of SSA over the entire hemisphere. This distribution is then rotated according to the shoot' s position in the canopy. Multiplying incoming PAR, canopy gap fraction and SSA in different directions, and summing over all directions, gives an estimate of PAR intercepted by the shoot during the chosen period of time. The method is described step by step, and applied, as an example, to a shoot from a Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) stand in central Finland. Differences in radiation interception properties between sun and shade shoots and their relevance to canopy-scale models are discussed.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

S Smolander, P Stenberg. 2001. A method for estimating light interception by a conifer shoot.. https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys%2F21.12-13.797

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

The evolution of gymnosperms redrawn by phytochrome genes: the Gnetatae appear at the base of the gymnosperms.

Gymnosperms possess two to four phytochrome types which apparently are the result of successive gene duplications in the genomes of their common ancestors. Phytochromes are nuclear-encoded proteins whose genes, contrary to chloroplast, mitochondrion, and rRNA genes, have hitherto rarely been used to examine gymnosperm phylogenies. Since the individual phytochrome gene types implied phylogenies that were not completely congruent to one another, conflicting branching orders were sorted by the number of gene lineages present in a taxon. The Gnetatae (two gene types) branched at the base of all gymnosperms, a position supported by bootstrap sampling (distance and character state trees, maximum likelihood). The Gnetatae were followed by Ginkgo, Cycadatae, and Pinaceae (three gene types) and the remaining conifers (four gene types). Therefore, in phytochrome trees, the most ancient branch of the conifers (Pinatae) seems to be the Pinaceae. The next split appears to have separated Araucariaceae plus Podocarpaceae from the Taxaceae/Taxodiaceae/Cupressaceae group. Structural arrangements in the plastid genomes (Raubeson and Jansen 1992) corroborate the finding that there is no close connection between Pinaceae and Gnetatae as suggested by some publications. The analyses are based on 60 phytochrome genes (579 positions in an alignment of PCR fragments) from 28 species. According to rough divergence time estimates, the last common ancestor of gymnosperms and angiosperms is likely to have existed in the Carboniferous.

Cycadopsida↗

Missing links: the genetic architecture of flowers [correction of flower] and floral diversification.

To understand the genetic architecture of floral development, including the origin and subsequent diversification of the flower, data are needed not only for a few model organisms but also for gymnosperms, basal angiosperm lineages and early-diverging eudicots. We must link what is known about derived model plants such as Arabidopsis, snapdragon and maize with other angiosperms. To this end, we suggest a massive evolutionary genomics effort focused on the identification and expression patterns of floral genes and elucidation of their expression patterns in 'missing-link' taxa differing in the arrangement, number and organization of floral parts.

Cycadopsida↗