PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 11499206

Get the data.

Abstract

Numerous studies affirm the benefit of rapid defibrillation with AEDs. Most of the data have been acquired in emergency medical response systems with EMTs or firefighters providing defibrillation. Yet interest is growing in the provision of rapid defibrillation by other responders, including security officers, flight attendants and laypersons trained as targeted responders. This expansion is embraced in community early defibrillation. A multicenter, prospective, randomized, controlled trial was recently launched to define the benefit of community early defibrillation. Data from this trial will likely identify the most effective deployment of AEDs, frequency and appropriateness of use, time of defibrillation before EMS arrival, device maintenance issues and--most importantly--survival benefit when compared with control groups without AEDs.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

R D White. 2001. Get the data.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11499206/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Understanding the normalization of telemedicine services through qualitative evaluation.

OBJECTIVE: Qualitative studies can help us understand the "successes" and "failures" of telemedicine to normalize within clinical service provision. This report presents the development of a robust conceptual model of normalization processes in the implementation and development of telemedicine services. DESIGN: Retrospective and cumulative analysis of longitudinal qualitative data from three studies was undertaken between 1997 and 2002. Observation and semistructured interviews produced a substantial body of data relating to approximately 582 discrete data collection episodes. Data were analyzed separately in each of three studies. Cumulative analysis was conducted by constant comparison. RESULTS: (1) Implementation of telemedicine services depends on a positive link with a (local or national) policy level sponsor. (2) Adoption of telemedicine systems in service depends on successful structural integration so that development of organizational structures takes place. (3) Translation of telemedicine technologies into clinical practice depends on the enrollment of cohesive, cooperative groups. (4) Stabilization of telemedicine systems in practice depends on integration at the level of professional knowledge and practice, where clinicians are able to accommodate telemedicine through the development of new procedures and protocols. CONCLUSION: A rationalized linear diffusion model of "telehealthcare" is inadequate in assessing the potential for normalization, and the political, organizational, and "ownership" problems that govern the process of development, implementation, and normalization need to be accounted for. This report presents a model for assessing the potential for successful implementation of telehealthcare services. This model defines the requirements for the successful normalization of telemedicine systems in clinical practice.

Diffusion of Innovation↗