PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 11503721

Developing beliefs that are compatible with death: revising our assumptions about predictability, control, and continuity.

Abstract

Many of us assume that life is highly predictable, subject to our control, and destined to continue indefinitely. Although such perspectives on life afford us a sense of security, these views tend to be incompatible with the experience of death. This article outlines the benefits of assimilating death into our belief systems and explores problems with waiting to alter our beliefs until after confrontation with death. Next, the article describes how we can use the strategy of imagining our own death or the death of loved ones as a means of making our beliefs more compatible with death. Options are then presented for overcoming resistances to imagining loss. Finally, the article proposes alternate ways of conceptualizing issues of predictability, control, and continuity; it addresses procedures for sustaining new beliefs in these areas; and it lists limitations associated with attempting to adopt such beliefs.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

C J Vickio. 2000. Developing beliefs that are compatible with death: revising our assumptions about predictability, control, and continuity.. https://doi.org/10.1080/074811800750036604

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Existence and pluralism: the rediscovery of Karl Jaspers.

Karl Jaspers has been recognized in psychiatry mostly for his influence on phenomenology and on certain aspects of psychopathology, such as our understanding of delusions. In this paper, I will highlight the need to rediscover Jaspers' work in terms of other important ideas that he can contribute to psychiatry, in particular the concepts of limit situations, transcendence and pluralism. Limit situations refer to the fact that human life is characterized by existential situations, or crises, which become opportunities for authentic existence. Transcendence refers to the notion that freedom is an important aspect of human existence and cannot be explained by purely scientific understanding or encompassed by any purely rationalistic system of thought. Pluralism is perhaps Jaspers' most original perspective, which has still failed to be adequately appreciated by the psychiatric profession. The idea here is that science means understanding the methods by which we obtain knowledge, along with the presuppositions and limits of those methods. Contemporary psychiatry has only a limited appreciation of Jaspers' work. In this paper, I attempt to describe these important concepts that can help us understand what we do in psychiatry, what we should be doing and why.

Attitude to Death↗