PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 11516231

Why the increases in upper respiratory problems?

Abstract

The incidence of ear infections has roughly tripled in the last 25 years. Sinus infections and allergies also have increased. Asthma, triggered by chronic sinus infections and allergies, has paralleled the increases of otitis. These increases began in the early 1970s when antihistamines, decongestants, and combinations thereof, became available without prescription and were heavily advertised in the growing media of television. These drugs are designed to block the immune system's attempts to wash pollutants and irritants from the nasopharynx. The alternative is helping the immune system with this washing. I have used such a technique in my office for the past three years. Its rationale is discussed as well as my own experience.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

A H Jones. 2001. Why the increases in upper respiratory problems?. https://doi.org/10.1054/mehy.2001.1362

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Assessing satisfaction with desloratadine and fexofenadine in allergy patients who report dissatisfaction with loratadine.

BACKGROUND: The FDA recently moved loratadine (Claritin) from prescription only status to over-the-counter (OTC). In response to the availability of an OTC non-sedating antihistamine, many managed care organizations are reevaluating which if any prescription antihistamines should remain on formulary. From a managed care perspective, determining which of the remaining prescription antihistamines results in the greatest patient satisfaction with allergy treatment would be informative. METHODS: We report on a weighted cross sectional survey (n = 10,023) delivered online to a sample of allergy sufferers in the U.S. during the month of December 2002. Two segments were identified for analysis: patient who were dissatisfied with loratadine and converted to desloratadine (Clarinex; n = 61), and patients who were dissatisfied with loratadine and converted to fexofenadine (Allegra; n = 211). The two segments were compared along a series of measures that the literature suggests are related to treatment satisfaction. RESULTS: The survey found that two of the satisfaction measures differentiated desloratadine converters from fexofenadine converters (p <.05): mean sum of self-reported adverse events and nighttime awakening due to allergy symptoms. For the remainder of satisfaction measures though, patients who were dissatisfied with loratadine reported equal duration of coverage and satisfaction with desloratadine as fexofenadine. When severity of disease was controlled for in the analysis, a pattern emerged suggesting greater levels of satisfaction amongst loratadine dissatisfied patients who converted to desloratadine. Point estimates suggest a consistent pattern favoring desloratadine patient satisfaction, with statistically significant results reported for sum of adverse effects, nighttime awakening due to symptoms, symptom severity just prior to the next dose, and overall satisfaction (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: On average, patients who were dissatisfied with loratadine reported equal or better satisfaction with desloratadine as fexofenadine. Patients with severe allergic rhinitis reported greater satisfaction when converted from loratadine to desloratadine than fexofenadine for select satisfaction measures. These results suggest that if managed care intends to position prescription antihistamines as second line for OTC loratadine treatment dissatisfaction, desloratadine is a useful treatment alternative. These findings, while informative to formulary decision-makers, must be interpreted with caution. Only through head-to-head controlled clinical trials can differences in efficacy and safety be established.

Histamine H1 Antagonists↗

Use of molecular topology for the prediction of physico-chemical, pharmacokinetic and toxicological properties of a group of antihistaminic drugs.

We used molecular connectivity to search mathematical models for predicting physico-chemical (e.g. the partition coefficient, P), pharmacokinetic (e.g. the time of maximum plasma level, and toxicological properties (lethal dose, LD) for a group of antihistaminic drugs. The results obtained clearly reveal the high efficiency of molecular topology for the prediction of these properties. Randomization and cross-validation by use of leave-one-out tests were also performed in order to assess the stability and the prediction ability of the connectivity functions selected.

Histamine H1 Antagonists↗