PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 11532280

Human C-reactive protein: expression, structure, and function.

Abstract

C-reactive protein (CRP) is an acute-phase protein featuring a homopentameric structure and Ca-binding specificity for phosphocholine (PCh). Expression of CRP is regulated mainly at the transcriptional level with interleukin-6 being the principal inducer of the gene during the acute phase. The crystal structure of CRP has been determined and the topology and chemical composition of its ligand-binding site determined. The wide distribution of PCh in polysaccharides of pathogens and in cellular membranes allows CRP to recognize a range of pathogenic targets as well as membranes of damaged and necrotic host cells. CRP bound to a multivalent ligand can efficiently initiate the assembly of a C3 convertase through the classical pathway and thus decorate the surface of the ligand with opsonic complement fragments. However, the protein does not favor the formation of a C5 convertase and therefore, CRP-initiated complement activation does not mediate acute inflammatory reactions and membrane damage. CRP also interacts with Fc receptors on phagocytic cells and acts as an opsonin. Other CRP-initiated signals through interactions with neutrophil Fc receptors have an overall anti-inflammatory effect. Thus, the main biological function of CRP appears to be host defense against bacterial pathogens and clearance of apoptotic and necrotic cells. Protection from lethal bacterial infection, from complement-induced alveolitis, and from endotoxemia has been confirmed in vivo using transgenic mice. Additional functions, including participation in atherogenesis and pathogenesis of myocardial injury after myocardial infarction have been reported. However, the weight of the evidence is that CRP like other acute-phase proteins is a component first line of innate host defense.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J E Volanakis. 2001. Human C-reactive protein: expression, structure, and function.. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0161-5890(01)00042-6

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Genetic overlap between depression and C-reactive protein levels: Evidence from a cross-trait analysis.

Inflammation and depression have been consistently associated, with elevated C-reactive protein (CRP) levels observed in a significant subset of affected individuals. However, the genetic mechanisms underlying this association remain poorly understood. We integrated results from large-scale genome-wide association studies (GWAS) of depression and CRP levels in a cross-trait analysis specifically focusing on identifying horizontally pleiotropic loci. Identified variants were stratified as concordant versus discordant based on their direction of effects on the two traits and followed up using functional annotation, gene set enrichment, and colocalization analyses. We also explored causal relationships using Mendelian Randomization (MR) analysis with extensive sensitivity analyses, including adjustment for body mass index (BMI). We identified 9 novel loci. Functional analyses revealed that concordant loci were enriched in genes linked to immune and inflammatory processes, while discordant loci mostly mapped to metabolic pathways, including lipid regulation. MR provided strong evidence for body mass index driving a causal relationship between the genetic liability of depression on CRP levels. Our findings suggest that the association between depression and CRP levels is partly driven by shared genetic influences, pointing to different biological pathways depending on whether genetic effects are concordant or discordant. These results underscore the importance of considering effect direction when assessing the genetic overlap between depression and inflammatory processes. In addition, they highlight BMI as a key factor in the causal relationship between depression and systemic inflammation.

C-Reactive Protein↗

The analysis of the usefulness of laparoscopic microwave coagulation therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with poor hepatic reserve by serial measurements of IL-6, cytokine antagonists, and C-reactive protein.

BACKGROUND: Little is known about the effectiveness of laparoscopic microwave coagulation therapy (L-MCT) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in patients with liver cirrhosis and poor hepatic reserve. Here, we analyzed the usefulness of laparoscopic MCT by comparing the serum levels of IL-6, cytokine antagonists, and C-reactive protein (CRP) following L-MCT with those following MCT with the open method (O-MCT). METHODS: Sixteen patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) were separated into L-MCT and O-MCT groups according to ICGR15 (ICGR15 30%<:L-MCT, 30%> :O-MCT). Nine patients with poorer hepatic reserve received L-MCT, while seven patients with relatively good hepatic reserve received O-MCT. Serum levels of cytokine antagonists (interleukin-6, IL-6; interleukin-1 receptor antagonist, IL-1ra; soluble tumor necrosis factor receptor type I, sTNF-R55) and C-reactive protein (CRP) were simultaneously measured on serial postoperative days (POD) by immunoassay. RESULTS: Postoperative serum levels of IL-6, IL-1ra, and CRP were significantly elevated on POD-1 and returned to the preoperative levels on POD-7 in both L-MCT and O-MCT groups. In contrast, no significant elevation of sTNF-R55 was found during the period in both groups. In addition, no statistical differences were found in the levels of IL-6, IL-1ra, sTNF-R, and CRP between the groups, except that the level of IL-6 on POD-1 in L-MCT group was significantly lower than that in the O-MCT group. CONCLUSION: These results suggested that the surgical stress by L-MCT in patients with poorer hepatic reserve were almost equal to that by O-MCT in patients with relatively good hepatic reserve, indicating the usefulness of L-MCT for HCC patients with poorer hepatic reserve. We recommend the laparoscopic approach for future patients with the criterion that ICGR15 is over 30%.

C-Reactive Protein↗

Low-density lipoprotein particle concentration and size as determined by nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy as predictors of cardiovascular disease in women.

BACKGROUND: Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) offers an alternative, spectroscopic means of quantifying LDL and of measuring LDL particle size. METHODS AND RESULTS: We conducted a prospective nested case-control study among healthy middle-aged women to assess LDL particle size (NMR) and concentration (NMR) as risk factors for future myocardial infarction, stroke, or death of coronary heart disease. Median baseline levels of LDL particle concentration (NMR) were higher (1597 vs 1404 nmol/L; P= 0.0001) and LDL particle size (NMR) was lower (21.5 vs 21.8 nm; P=0.046) among women who subsequently had cardiovascular events (n=130) than among those who did not (n= 130). Of these 2 factors, LDL particle concentration (NMR) was the stronger predictor (relative risk for the highest compared with the lowest quartile=4.17, 95% CI 1.96-8.87). This compared with a relative risk of 3.11 (95% CI 1.55-6.26) for the ratio of total cholesterol to HDL cholesterol and a relative risk of 5.91 (95% CI 2.65-13.15) for C-reactive protein. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves for LDL particle concentration (NMR), total cholesterol to HDL cholesterol ratio, and C-reactive protein were 0.64, 0.64, and 0.66, respectively. LDL particle concentration (NMR) correlated with several traditionally assessed lipid and nonlipid risk factors, and thus adjustment for these tended to attenuate the magnitude of association between LDL particle concentration (NMR) and risk. CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort, LDL particle concentration measured by NMR spectroscopy was a predictor of future cardiovascular risk. However, the magnitude of predictive value of LDL particle concentration (NMR) was not substantively different from that of the total cholesterol to HDL cholesterol ratio and was less than that of C-reactive protein.

C-Reactive Protein↗