Supernormal auditory localization. I. General background.

N I Durlach; B G Shinn-Cunningham; R M Held

doi:10.1162/pres.1993.2.2.89

Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 11539925

Supernormal auditory localization. I. General background.

N I Durlach·B G Shinn-Cunningham·R M Held

View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

In this series of papers, we consider human auditory localization and how its deficiencies can be reduced by appropriate processing and coding of acoustical signals in teleoperator and virtual-environment systems. Attention is given to how localization cues can be altered to improve the just-noticeable-difference (JND) in spatial position and to phenomena related to the use of such altered localization cues for the identification of spatial position. Unlike most current studies of synthetic auditory localization, our study includes consideration of distance as well as direction. In this first paper of the series, we provide general background material. In subsequent papers, we will present a variety of empirical results.

Explore related subjects

Auditory Perception Data Display Discrimination, Psychological Evoked Potentials, Auditory Head Humans Man-Machine Systems Psychoacoustics Robotics Sound Localization Space Perception User-Computer Interface NASA Discipline Space Human Factors Non-NASA Center Journal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

N I Durlach, B G Shinn-Cunningham, R M Held. 1993. Supernormal auditory localization. I. General background.. https://doi.org/10.1162/pres.1993.2.2.89

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2003

Naïve and experienced judgments of stimulus-response compatibility: implications for interface design.

Many design guidelines encourage maintaining stimulus-response compatibility whenever possible. Payne found that naïve judgments for different stimulus-response (S-R) mappings were not very accurate, and suggested that designers may not be able to predict whether a particular display-control configuration will lead to better performance than another. Three experiments were conducted to determine whether naïve judgments for two-choice tasks in which stimuli and responses involve left-right spatial information are sensitive to (a) the influence of S-R mode relations and (b) pure versus mixed presentation of compatible and incompatible mappings. Initial performance judgments for these conditions were not very accurate, nor were those for four-choice tasks of the type studied by Payne, but subjects' estimates of performance improved with relatively little experience using the different S-R configurations.

Auditory Perception↗

PubMed2003

The "Flash-Lag" effect occurs in audition and cross-modally.

In 1958 MacKay showed that a rigidly moving object becomes visually fragmented when part of it is continuously visible but the rest is illuminated intermittently. For example, the glowing tip of a lit cigarette moving under stroboscopic illumination appeared to move ahead of the intermittently lit body. Latterly rediscovered as "the flash-lag effect" (FLE), this illusion now is typically demonstrated on a computer monitor showing two spots of light, one translating across the screen and another briefly flashed in vertical alignment with it. Despite being physically aligned, the brief flash is seen to lag behind the moving spot. This effect has recently motivated much fruitful research, prompting a variety of potential explanations, including those based on motion extrapolation, differential latency, attention, postdiction, and temporal integration (for review, see ). With no consensus on which theory is most plausible, we have broadened the scope of enquiry to include audition and have found that the FLE is not confined to vision. Whether the auditory motion stimulus is a frequency sweep or a translating sound source, briefly presented auditory stimuli lag behind auditory movement. In addition, when we used spatial motion, we found that the FLE can occur cross-modally. Together, these findings challenge several FLE theories and point to a discrepancy between internal brain timing and external stimulus timing.

Auditory Perception↗

PubMed2003

Auditory response to a photic stimulus.

BACKGROUND: The photic sneeze response is a well-established clinical phenomenon in which patients respond by sneezing in an uncontrolled manner. This paroxysm of sneezing is evoked by a sudden exposure to an intense or bright light source. The pathogenesis of this response is apparently quite complex. Sudden exposure to bright light involves the optic, oculomotor, and trigeminal nerves, the autonomic nervous system and central brainstem functions. Anecdotal reports have suggested the photic sneezing response may occur as an autosomal dominantly inherited condition. However, such a familial pattern is not always present. METHODS: This article presents a descriptive report of a case in which a patient sought comprehensive eye care and, during the course of the examination, reported a relationship between light and a predictable auditory response. The mechanism for this involuntary auditory response to a bright light may be similar to that involved with photic sneeze response. RESULTS: This patient's history, specific features of the auditory response, and ophthalmic findings as a result of the comprehensive eye examination are reported. CONCLUSION: The photic sneeze response is not an uncommon phenomenon. A similar mechanism may explain the auditory response to a photic stimulus reported in this article.

Auditory Perception↗