PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 11564323

Viewpoint dependency in visual object recognition does not necessarily imply viewer-centered representation.

M Bar
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The nature of visual object representation in the brain is the subject of a prolonged debate. One set of theories asserts that objects are represented by their structural description and the representation is "object-centered." Theories from the other side of the debate suggest that humans store multiple "snapshots" for each object, depicting it as seen under various conditions, and the representation is therefore "viewer-centered." The principal tool that has been used to support and criticize each of these hypotheses is subjects' performance in recognizing objects under novel viewing conditions. For example, if subjects take more time in recognizing an object from an unfamiliar viewpoint, it is common to claim that the representation of that object is viewpoint-dependent and therefore viewer-centered. It is suggested here, however, that performance cost in recognition of objects under novel conditions may be misleading when studying the nature of object representation. Specifically, it is argued that viewpoint-dependent performance is not necessarily an indication of viewer-centered representation. An account for the neural basis of perceptual priming is first provided. In light of this account, it is conceivable that viewpoint dependency reflects the utilization of neural paths with different levels of sensitivity en route to the same representation, rather than the existence of viewpoint-specific representations. New experimental paradigms are required to study the validity of the viewer-centered approach.

Explore related subjects

Cerebral CortexHumansMemoryPattern Recognition, VisualJournal ArticleResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tReview

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

M Bar. 2001-08-15. Viewpoint dependency in visual object recognition does not necessarily imply viewer-centered representation.. https://doi.org/10.1162/08989290152541458

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2026

Histone H3K9 methyltransferases regulate cortical growth by coordinating heterochromatin formation and neural progenitor dynamics.

DNA packaging into heterochromatin is a fundamental mechanism of transcriptional silencing, yet its role in regulating neural progenitor behavior during brain development remains poorly understood. Trimethylation of histone H3 lysine 9 (H3K9me3), catalyzed by the methyltransferases SETDB1, SUV39H1, and SUV39H2, is a defining feature of heterochromatin, but functional redundancy among these enzymes has obscured their developmental roles. Here, we generated a cortex-specific triple knockout mouse model lacking Setdb1, Suv39h1, and Suv39h2 to directly interrogate H3K9me3 function during corticogenesis. Combined loss of H3K9 methyltransferases caused genome-wide depletion of H3K9me3, disruption of neural progenitor cell-cycle progression, and impaired cortical neurogenesis, resulting in microcephaly. H3K9 methyltransferases preserve neural progenitor identity and function by silencing clustered protocadherins, meiosis-associated genes, and a cell-cycle restraint program through H3K9me3 deposition. Loss of H3K9me3 promoted local chromatin opening and increased transcription factor occupancy, enabling transposable elements to acquire cryptic enhancer activity and modulate proximal gene expression. Together, these findings establish H3K9me3 heterochromatin as an active regulator of neural progenitor dynamics and lineage fidelity, revealing a central epigenetic mechanism that restricts aberrant transcriptional programs to ensure cortical growth.

Cerebral Cortex↗
PubMed2007

Prosopagnosia.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Cerebral Cortex↗
PubMed2007

Prenatal diagnosis of malformations of cortical development by dedicated neurosonography.

OBJECTIVE: Malformations of cortical development (MCD) are rarely diagnosed in utero. We describe and compare the ultrasonographic and pathology findings in a cohort of fetuses with MCD. METHODS: Fetuses with MCD were identified among all fetuses evaluated for suspected brain anomalies at the Fetal Neurology Clinic, and the ultrasonographic findings were compared with the results of the pathology examination. RESULTS: We suspected the presence of MCD by ultrasonography in 23 fetuses. The mean gestational age at the time of ultrasound diagnosis was 26.2 (range, 18-40) weeks. The ultrasonographic findings leading to the diagnosis of MCD were abnormally overdeveloped gyri and sulci for gestational age (n = 7), delay in sulcation (n = 5), abnormally thin cortex (n = 5) abnormally wide and broad sulci (n = 3), bulging into the lateral ventricle (n = 1), cortical cleft (n = 1), and multiple intraparenchymal echogenic nodules (n = 1). All fetuses had associated central nervous system (CNS) and/or non-CNS anomalies. Pathology examination (performed in 17 fetuses) confirmed MCD in 16. CONCLUSIONS: Cortical malformations can be diagnosed in utero by ultrasonography based on the presence of specific deviations from the normal pattern of development. The identified cases may represent the more severe forms in the MCD spectrum. The pathology findings do not always conform to the current classification systems of MCD but help in differentiating between possible genetic and acquired etiologies and in some cases provide a definitive syndromic diagnosis.

Cerebral Cortex↗