PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 11570499

Comparative evaluation of laser-based microarray scanners.

Abstract

Laboratories use different laser-based scanners to scan microarray images. To assess whether results from different scanners are comparable, and thus whether data from different laboratories can be compared, we scanned the same microarray slide with three commercial scanners that use different imaging techniques. After the acquisition of the microarray images produced by the three scanners, the images were quantified using a single imaging software package and protocol. The results were compared, and we found that the data obtained from the three scanners were comparable and that the variations caused by the use of different instruments were negligible, in spite of the fact that the scanners were based on different optical imaging techniques.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

L Ramdas, J Wang, L Hu, D Cogdell, E Taylor, W Zhang. 2001. Comparative evaluation of laser-based microarray scanners.. https://doi.org/10.2144/01313st09

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Optimizing spotting solutions for increased reproducibility of cDNA microarrays.

The ability to extract meaningful information from transcriptome technologies such as cDNA microarrays relies on the precision, sensitivity and reproducibility of the measured values for a given gene across multiple samples. Given the lack of a 'gold standard' for the production of microarrays using current technologies, there is a high degree of variation in the quality of data derived from microarray experiments. Poor reproducibility not only adds to the cost of a given study but also leads to data sets that are difficult to interpret. For glass slide DNA microarrays, much of this variation is introduced systematically, during the spotting, or deposition, of the DNA onto the slide surface. In order to reduce this type of systematic variation we tested spotting solutions containing different detergent additives in the presence of one of two different denaturants and determined their effect on spot quality. We show that spotting cDNA in a solution consisting of the zwitterionic detergent 3-[(3-cholamidopropyl)dimethylammonio]-1-propane sulfonate (CHAPS) in the presence of formamide or dimethyl sulfoxide yields spots of superior quality in terms of morphology, size homogeneity and signal reproducibility, as well as overall intensity, when used with popular, commercially available slides.

Carbocyanines↗

The use of fluorescence resonance energy transfer to monitor dynamic changes of lipid-DNA interactions during lipoplex formation.

Fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) was used to monitor interactions between Cy3-labeled plasmid DNA and NBD-labeled cationic liposomes. FRET data show that binding of cationic liposomes to DNA occurs immediately upon mixing (within 1 min), but FRET efficiencies do not stabilize for 1-5 h. The time allowed for complex formation has effects on in vitro luciferase transfection efficiencies of DOPE-based lipoplexes; i.e., lipoplexes prepared with a 1-h incubation have much higher transfection efficiencies than samples with 1-min or 5-h incubations. The molar charge ratio of DOTAP to negatively charged phosphates in the DNA (DOTAP+/DNA-) also affected the interaction between liposomes and plasmid DNA, and interactions stabilized more rapidly at higher charge ratios. Lipoplexes formulated with DOPE were more resistant to high ionic strength than complexes formulated with cholesterol. Taken together, our data demonstrate that lipid-DNA interactions and in vitro transfection efficiencies are strongly affected by the time allowed for complex formation. This effect is especially evident in DOPE-based lipoplexes, and suggests that the time allowed for lipoplex formation is a parameter that should be carefully controlled in future studies.

Carbocyanines↗

Intramolecular dimers: a new design strategy for fluorescence-quenched probes.

Fluorogenic probes dual-labeled with reporter and quencher dyes use a change in fluorescence to monitor biochemical events (e.g., substrate binding or enzyme digestion). Such events change the reporter-quencher distance, which affects fluorescence. Recently, it is has been shown that static quenching through intramolecular dimers is an important mechanism that can sometimes be more efficient than Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET).

Carbocyanines↗